Friday, November 30, 2018

Male Elders

My Dad had class. His kind of star quality shined quietly and sure. Throughout his life he met all challenges, intelligently, dispassionately. Whether it was dealing with Mom’s deterioration, various traumas visited upon him by his kids (not the least of which was me), or financial strains, he always kept his poise and equanimity. His patience, like his hospitality, was legendary. I never heard him complain about the psychedelic music blaring on the radio as he drove me somewhere; and to my friends he was ever the accommodating and cheerful host. He was a man of great faith—a faith that showed he knew his own limits, a faith that knew how to unblinkingly dispatch unnecessary worry to a power greater than himself. Never preachy, still, he displayed an ethical certitude about things in a way that epitomized and defined his generation. His voice came through to me in the letters he wrote to me over the years. It was a voice that was an eternal flame of hope and kind encouragement, as I bungled from one venture to another.

Yes, in the late ‘60s and ‘70s I proved to be quite the bungling fool as I inched my way forward in life. Our whole family was coming apart then due to Mom’s Alzheimer’s. And this was occurring at the exact same time society was unraveling. By the early ‘70s, I for one was on a rough and rocky road indeed. 
 
In early August, 1974, President Richard M. Nixon resigned. At that time I was half renting/half squatting in a room at a beach house on 7th Street in Bethany. It was being rehabbed by Chris Minnick, an upper classman I had known at Gonzaga. As I recall, I had ridden out there on my blue, 350 Yamaha YR1 motorcycle. It had recently rained. On the way, as I was crossing over some railroad tracks, my bike skidded and I almost lost control. I think I threw my leg out to keep from falling over—or maybe I just threw my weight to the other side. Anyway, I could have been severely injured but I managed to right myself and just kept on going. Such were the haphazard, care-free days of this 20-year old.

Nixon had been the adversary of our family hero, John F. Kennedy. For the Susses Nixon represented everything that was old-fashioned and stupid. And in 1974 I remember taking sides against Nixon regarding the Watergate fiasco. Like almost everybody I knew, I unthinkingly believed the media narrative. (At the time, only insiders could have known any better.)  And so Nixon’s resignation seemed like a good thing to me at the time, though I was also kind of “ho-hum” about it. Beach bum that I was, I was too distracted at the time to dwell on it much.

I recall that in the foyer of Minnick’s beach house were a bunch of discarded paperbacks. I picked up one, Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov and really started getting into it. I remember identifying somewhat with the Karamazov brother named “Alyosha.” I was about the same age as this character and I admired in him the same sort of ideals to which I too aspired!  As a result, I couldn’t put the book down. But it is a long novel (as all of Dostoevsky’s novels are) and I still had a long way to go when I returned home.

When I got back, my grandfather asked me if I would drive him down to Orlando, Florida. He wanted to check on his house down there and also wanted me to help him with any repairs it might need. I agreed and within a day or so we left, with me at the wheel of his black 1965 Lincoln Continental, albeit without a radio. (My grandfather had disconnected the radio right after he bought it; I thought it was because he wouldn’t stand for the “noise” of what was being broadcast, though he never admitted any particular reason to me for doing so other than saying he “didn’t like it.”)     
As with my own father, my grandfather McGuire also had a certain class, though it was a class of another sort. We grandchildren called him “Grandpap.” His hard, hidden strength of character shone in your face none-the-less. In fact it almost blinded you. And yet I knew him only in his elder years. By then, the vagaries of life had softened him somewhat. Still, he was hard-boiled—the product of a no-nonsense boyhood spent on the family farm. He still chewed tobacco—Mail Pouch Tobacco—(and of course spit tobacco juice) until the day he died, about four years after our excursion together. I remember that as a child I had fallen on the street and skinned the palm of my hand while running around to get into the car. When I climbed into the back seat where Grandpap was, he took hold of my palm, looked at the scrape, then spat some tobacco juice on it and rubbed it in. The shock of seeing him spit on me staunched my tears immediately.

Grandpap had a playful side too that bordered on the poetic, as evidenced in some of the letters he left behind. (Go seek them out and ye shall find this to be true.) He enjoyed a good belly-laugh. Often he would chuckle, finding humor in things when it suited him. But more than anything else, what comes to mind when I think of Grandpap was that he was simple and sensible. And he was essentially a moralist. But, like Dad, he wasn’t preachy, at least not all that much, though his temper wasn’t as controlled. If provoked he might easily bark at you. Notwithstanding his seemingly cold, hard exterior there lurked a beautiful goodness that shined through. Others I know might not agree, but I always thought so. Maybe it was the Irish in him, confounded by that stern Germanic blood also running through his veins that made him a bit of a walking contradiction. I preferred to simply think of him as “old school” in his outlook.

And so we went on our journey to Florida. It was the one and only time we ever spent together, just the two of us. I drove us down there. Then the daily work began. He organized things and sort of supervised from his fold-out chair. I remember doing some painting and some screen repair. I’ve always enjoyed staying busy and I liked feeling useful to him. In the evening I’d have a beer or two (that he would buy, of course).

Grandpap forever had his nose in a newspaper. And while he read his paper I was slogging through The Brothers Karamazov. One day an old friend of Grandpap’s by the name of Paul Onda dropped by. Onda was a stump-of-a-man, a broad-faced, hard-working dynamo. I recall he had a ready smile and a ready wit. I understood immediately why Grandpap found him to be pleasant company. I imagined Onda felt the same way about Grandpap, who also knew a lot about building and working hard and who also enjoyed a good laugh. We spent an evening or two in rambling conversation. Although I was more of a spectator than a participant, it seemed like good fellowship all the way around.

Coming back home we were traveling on a typical two-lane rural road of the type you often find in Florida, with deep culverts on either side of the roadway, i.e., drainage ditches. There was very little shoulder. It began raining hard. In fact, soon it became quite the tropical downpour. I, of course, put the windshield wipers on. But as we proceeded along, the wipers suddenly stopped working! The whole windshield became one big blur. I couldn’t see a thing. So I decelerated, and as I did so, I put on the emergency flashers and pulled gently over to the side of the road, being careful not to fall into the culvert but trying not to stick too far out into the road. As luck would have it, no one slammed into us while we waited for the rain to let up.
  
Grandpap pulled out a map and told me to head for a nearby town, pointing out the way as we went. We soon pulled into the town and found a garage. Grandpap got out and talked to the mechanic, and the next thing I knew the car was in the bay and Grandpap was in there overseeing the mechanic as he worked away on the wipers. It wasn’t long before he finished up. With the wipers fixed we started back on our way. Grandpap told me to continue on, away from the direction we had come. I said, “But Grandpap, we came in from the other direction,” and I headed back that way. In his inimitable, hoarse, scolding voice he exclaimed, “Stop the car!” So I stopped, then made a U-turn. Sure enough, he was right. The highway going north picked up on the other side of town.
 
When we arrived back in Maryland and pulled up to his house he reached for his wallet. He took out the remainder of the cash there, perhaps $30 or so, and handed it to me. I heard later from my aunt that he told her, “You know, Jack’s not as wild as I thought he was.” That was the nicest thing I ever heard him say about me and it made me feel good to hear that.
 
I can’t say I ever had a similar one-on-one trip like that with my Dad. After all, I was one of eight kids, he was a busy professional man, and most trips we took were back to his hometown of Springfield, Massachusetts, where his mother and siblings still lived.
 
My father was a Democrat, a liberal; my grandfather was a Republican, a conservative. Neither of them talked much about their political sensibilities. But I recall my father’s admiration for Franklin Roosevelt, while Grandpap thought Roosevelt was a curse upon this country (as I do). And I remember asking my Dad what left wing and right wing meant. I think he used the typical, well-worn Commie vs. Nazi analogy in the end. And when I asked him where he stood, he said that he thought it was best to stay somewhere in the middle. I don’t think I ever asked Grandpap that same question, but now I wish I had.
 
During his lifetime Dad worked mostly for the federal or state governments; Grandpap worked in the private sector, eventually for himself. They were both good men but also different men whose distinct life paths shaped their visions and values. Their lifeways were also shaped by what they were personally able to do.
 As mentioned, Grandpap was knowledgeable about building; he had studied engineering in college and had built a few structures in his lifetime. Then he went into business, saved his money, kept his credit, invested in the stock market, and eventually became a wealthy, self-made man who often stated, "Your grandmother and I have lived under the poverty level all of our lives and we've never wanted for anything." In other words he eschewed easy credit and his life remained always simple, the antithesis of conspicuous consumption. And Grandpap's values never strayed far from his humble beginnings.
 
Dad, being the son of Lebanese Christian immigrants, came from humble beginnings himself. He exhibited basic and solid carpentry skills and he had a natural ability to draw. (I know this because of the soap box derby he built for me and my brothers, among other things, and the drawings of stuff he would do for us kids upon request.) He was a U.S. Naval Officer, a government and anti-trust lawyer, and retired as an administrative law judge for the State of New York. The home he made for us was not grand, by any means, but was a suitable testament to his professional station in life.
 
They both shared an appreciation for humor. Neither one shied away from working or complained about much of anything. They each loved their wives and were completely dedicated husbands.
In the final analysis, what I can say about them both is this: In their own ways they shined while the sun shone down upon them and I loved them. Even if it was by loose association (osmosis) I learned a lot from being around them.
 
In these days when the power of women is ascendant and the power of men is demeaned and downplayed it is more important than ever to recognize and revere one’s father, grandfather(s) and one’s forefathers as far back (and as much) as it is possible to know.
 

Monday, November 26, 2018

Operation Lemon Twist

My great-grandfather, Lemon Miller, standing on the front porch of the Somerset property.

Well, the year 2018 is drawing to a close. August, September, October, and now November have all slipped away. The old Lemon Miller property in Somerset is tucked away for the winter.  And I look back wistfully on this weird task that had engrossed so much of my energy and attention during these months.
 
The place still has no tenants save one, my cousin Patrick McGuire (who prefers to be called Pat). He continues to hobble around as he deals with his right knee replacement. Pat’s discouraged about his progress. He does little else than watch TV or go to the movies, and barely manages caring for himself and his cat, Jinksy. (His cat was aptly named—it seems like Pat’s whole life has been jinxed with bad luck in so many ways). For over three months we’ve been waiting for the plumber to knock out a list of things. We’re still waiting. Of prime importance to Pat is the plumbing and venting of a washer and dryer we’re looking to stack in his apartment.
 
Being on this plumber’s gauntlet is a uniquely irritating experience. The two available apartments can be shown, though occupancy still depends upon the plumber finishing up. The wait is really frustrating for both of us. The plumber is the only uncooperative tradesman I’ve encountered in Somerset during the whole process. His being busy is one thing, but ignoring an old customer for such an unreasonable amount of time is just plain rude. Still, no trick in the book works to get him over there. Lord knows, I've tried. 
 
The job of being a landlord is one of my least favorite roles. Dealing with tradesmen is (normally) a breeze compared with interacting with tenants. With difficult tenants a landlord needs to be mercenary, direct, assertive, and generally unmerciful. The first evicted tenant was a young couple and their three kids. They left willingly, abandoning the premises. I had little to do with them and in fact felt a bit sorry for them (even though they owed two months back rent and left a ton of debris on every level of the house).
 
The other tenant was a scheming, unworthy, slug-like woman, a drinker, and her worthless 22-year old grandson, both of whom made my job a more thankless task than it already was. These occupants were the residual from the former mismanagement of the place. They and the rest of their dysfunctional family were noisy, which bothered my cousin. We praise the heavens that they are now gone. However, she left an apartment in her wake whose tongue-in-groove oak floor was ruined by cat and dog piss.
 
More often than not, my humanity gets in the way of my duties as a landlord. And while I try to assist a tenant who is truly in need, someone who has encountered trouble and difficult times, I lose it when a tenant deceives me, takes advantage of my tendency to be lenient, and then shows no regard for the lease agreement. Still, it is my old-school values—of saying what I mean and meaning what I say—that help me to get the job done. Especially in this instance, when a tenant failed to show the least bit of proper care for a property with a certain sentimental value, patience ran extremely thin. Consequently, my subsequent determination to evict this last no-good tenant became personal.  
 
But all of this is behind me now and I must not bear a grudge. I have my judgments, both recorded. I still need to levy on them, or at least on one. I will do so, by-and-by (after my civil proceeding for damages).
 
The job of Mr. Fix-It is somewhat more interesting than that of Landlord. I learned quite a bit about how to go about it by going about it. The intricacies of this odyssey were memorialized in prior essays on this blog. Enough said, I suppose, except that now I look back and reflect on the entire drama as a whole.
 
I refer to it as Operation Lemon Twist in honor of my Great Grandfather Lemon Miller who originally bought the place in 1921. My intention was to restore the house as close to its former glory as I could. His daughter, my Great Aunt Jenny, who resided there for over 45 years, would probably be gratified with the care I took in doing so. Lord knows, the place needed attention and getting it squared away sure put me in a twist. But it’s nice to behold the final product and to have made various personal relationships along the way with tradesmen, store clerks, the folks at the water company, the magistrate who presided in my eviction proceedings, and others, not the least of which was my cousin Pat.
 
More needs to be done, but under Operation Lemon Twist the place has shaped up nicely despite years of neglect to the exterior and the damage done by this last, thoughtless tenant. In the Spring I intend to rent what I call a cherry picker (a traveling crane equipped for holding a worker at the end of the boom) in order to wrap the four dormer fascia boards and paint the remaining woodwork that is up high. (Some photos of the place will soon be posted.)
 
There was another twist. During these past months, Aunt Janet added me to the deed as a joint tenant. She had offered the Somerset place to Pat. He seemed the likeliest beneficiary, given that he had retired there. But he declined. I double checked with him and sought out the reason. He just didn't want to be bothered. So I accepted Janet's kind offer.
 
At first I felt funny about it—further "twisted"—and wanted to keep it quiet. But I did note in my post of Sept. 5 (the first of three parts on my time there), "...the torch now seems to be passing to me." No one picked up on that. Soon I figured I was being silly to not let my siblings and others know about this gift. And once they found out, no one seemed to care.
 
Owning real property, as with material gain generally, brings responsibilities. Being pegged as an absentee landlord has never sat well with this natural free-spirit-rolling stone. As time unfolds time will tell how I fare as the latest in a chain of custodians.
 
Getting the daggone thing fully rented is the immediate concern. And so, a prayer goes out to the plumber to hasten to the task!—and to the property manager that she may soon find suitable new tenants for this stately old house in a neighborhood that has a "goin' down slow" feel to it these days.
 
As they say, if the mule don't die and the crick don't freeze the old Miller-McGuire house may yet see brighter days. I won't exactly pin my hopes on it. I'll just keep trying to do the best I can, which all anyone can ever do anyway. 

Saturday, November 10, 2018

¡SHOUTERS!

Though I think Dinesh D'Souza is brilliant, there's something about him that never quite sat well with me. Now, perhaps, I may have put my finger on it. 
 
Have a look at one of his lectures here:
It skips/begins at about the 27-minute mark, depicting inane shouters in the audience and his reaction to them.
 
Maybe it's his often used comparison to the National Socialist ("Nazi") model. His take is more Hollywood Nazism, rather than having a more circumspect view of those times. The Germany of the 1930s was a place that was then being radically transformed/subverted by the same types of Communist-Socialist Deep State Swamp forces so detested today by true patriots. The threat was so entrenched, threatening, and out-of-control by the late '30s that active militancy by brown shirts shouting down these Commies, for example, were acts of courage (rather than the roles being reversed as they are today, wherein they are acts of ignorant servility). In other words, activism in service to righteous anger at injustice is acceptable, whereas the reverse is not. Granted, shouting down an opponent is not elegant. But it makes a statement, none-the-less, because it interposes a provocative scene that just may make people think.
 
D'Souza, like Jordan Peterson, is able to keep his cool and attempt to engage moron shouters, which is admirable and constructive. Still, his analogy to National Socialist supporters is off-the-mark to me, as explained herein.
 
In my opinion, the fine line that must be walked here is this: one must be able to discern when righteous anger is truly righteous, rather than parading its own ignorancethat's a subjective political question, on the one hand, but is also a moral/spiritual one, on the other. That is, the questions to ask are: Who has more control (political)? Is the group with more control standing up for virtue, morality, goodness, and God-given liberty (moral/spiritual)? If so, shouters are mere moronic hecklers; if not, then shouters are brave foot soldiers making a peremptory attack on evil and amoral forces. And though, as I say, it is not an elegant act, I think it is important to realize that there is a job for each of us; "different strokes for different folks." Some jobs, like shouting down lecturers, are just more tacky and rank than others, even when just, i.e., justified.
 
In America today, leftist fascism serves the politically correct, welfare state that the System pushes like an opiate via its Deep State Swamp controller-handlers. Right-wing fascism is a contradiction in terms, if by "right-wing" you mean conservatism, or the label I prefer: traditionalism. But that's another essay, another post for another day.
 
I don't know how much the "Socialist" part of the party name was meant as a ruse to placate and attract socialists into their camp when they were just getting organized in the '30sor how much they seriously considered themselves to be socialists (albeit until the industries were freed from outside control, viz., non-Germanic volk interests, and could then manage independently again). If the latter was true, total power may have indeed seduced the state so that so-called Nazism became fascist, i.e., the state became permanently fused with corporatism.
 
I would say that is the case with the USA, Inc. right now, a leftist fascist fusion. But shifting the power to correct the injustice is tricky too. For example, author Ellen Brown proposes nationalizing the banks, which the National Socialists did (at least partially). If that happens what's to stop a likewise seduction by power, which would likely end up as just a transfer of banking power from "private" to "public" puppet masters?
 
We can call it right or leftist fascism if we want, but it's better thought of as simply fascism, defined as state-corporate fusion control, centralized and perpetuated at the expense of the People whose sovereignty has been stolen, subverted, and weaponized against them.
 
Government and industry are all about power and wealth. Unchecked, there is an "intoxicating, egoic high" derived from the subsequent control maintained over the People that is sadistically enjoyed by elitists in both spheres. Just how to impose "checks" on government and industry is what our founding documents and wiser laws are all about. I'm speaking of course about the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights (especially) in the United States Constitution, and certain laws (if justiciably enforced and interpreted), e.g., the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, laws on legal immigration, and laws against pollution and unfair labor practices. The passing, enforcement and interpretation of laws depends upon three-branches of government properly functioning and not unduly influenceda tall order, perhaps, but not a total impossibility.

The trick is to know when the shouters are representing the People or a corrupt System. 
 
So shout all you want, rude interlopers, only educate yourselves first as to who's who and who's doing what to whom, so you know who and what you're really shouting at before deciding to interrupt and shout down a lecturer! 

Friday, November 9, 2018

Panama Refuge

When the SHTF we need a place to go. A buddy has just homesteaded a place in Panama. It's a three-parcel property overlooking the Pacific. He's holding a hillside for me to come and build my escape dream house. As I "sort it all out" I recently wrote him the following e-letter. It begins by discussing "Faith," which one needs a lot of if embarking on such an odyssey...  
The thing about Faith is you either have it or you don't. There are all sorts of notions, theories and ideas about Jesus of Nazareth. Some are interesting to ponder. And there is the very real possibility that "Church Fathers" have twisted things over the millennia so that there are errors or outright disinformation.

I believe that humility, devotion and adoration are central to a holy life. I recall in the film Gladiator when the Roman general (played by Russell Crowe) was fidgeting around with his little household god effigies. It's as important to recognize a greater, divine power beyond one's self as it is to recognize that same spark within us. The person of Jesus made God a personal one for us all. And I believe that whatever physical things help to move us in the direction of recognizing what is sacred are good too. And so maybe building that house on the Panamanian hill is one such dedicated physical manifestation.

This brings me to The Paradox: the seeming contradiction of spiritual beings incarnated in physical bodies. All religion grapples with this  anomalous condition of humanity. Sci-fi also deals with it in various ways, as in works that explore whether an android with AI can have a soul. We know intuitively that we are more than the sum of our "parts." And after immersing myself in consciousness studies I still cannot apprehend exactly what the difference is between consciousness and Spirit manifesting as one's soul. So these are very interesting, likely unanswerable, questions that have been asked since time immemorial and will always be pondered.

Now, getting more to your email. Everything we think and do revolves around having a right intention based on a dependent perception that leads us to a certain action outcome. So let's take immigrating to the Panamanian outback as the action outcome. Obviously you had and continue to have certain perceptions which led your intention in that direction. Me too, though perhaps not as strong and not as urgent as in your case. Societal breakdown, overpopulation, corporate fascism, Zio-Illuminati Satanism infusing liberal non-values that are now running rampant, whatever---i.e., the whole world is going to hell in a hand basket. These are and have been our perceptions, which are decidedly on the mark.

We've discussed the notion of having a refuge for when the SHTF, away from cities, in a place that is self-sustainable. This is what originally drew you to Finca Bayano. (Too bad there was a fink at that finca, but that may have been a factor that put your tenacity and fortitude to the test.) In any event, you have openly offered your reasons in a very frank way and you've demonstrated that you have the courage of your convictions by following through on your plan. Your reports from the field indicate that there is a steep learning curve and that you are toughing out the difficulties while appreciating the poetic moments. And I have had the opportunity of vicariously sharing in your adventure, which I appreciate immensely.

And so, your perceptions led you to your intention and you acted accordingly. I, on the other hand, while I have the same or similar perceptions and I have developed a similar intention, it is less concrete, more theoretical; and I have not taken even an action step as of yet to realize my intention, probably because that intention is not yet fully formed. Lack of funds has something to do with it. But other factors figure into it: viz., family obligations to my wife, granddaughter, and aunt; certain cultural/logistical fears about living in a Hispanic culture; and another, more metaphysical question nags at me and here it is: is prepping like this a manifestation of the fear of my own mortality and if not, what is the more noble basis for leaving the nation of one's birth to set out into the unknown, leaving family, friends and familiarity behind?

In that same metaphysical dimension is this related concern: just as fear for one's physical well-being can fuel all sorts of actions, facing the unknown also brings up concern about the ability of one's mental resiliency to cope and the depth of one's spiritual convictions to persevere in the face of difficulties and failures. This second concern is inextricably bound up with the first.

My purpose is to establish a sort of monastic beach head (similar to Morris Berman's "monastic option") that can also serve as a refuge for anyone needing it during the calamities that we expect to come and indeed, are already upon us. For me there must be a greater purpose for immigrating there---something much greater than myself; one that assists humanity, or for starters, an optional place in which my granddaughter can grow up and thrive away from all of the shit of the modern world.

This is what motivates me. I don't care much anymore about my own physical being. And I've done just about everything I ever wanted to do in life. I still have the work of my hands---my writing and my modest abilities to create dreams out of nothing. In short, I'm a weird task specialist on a mission (as much or more than Dan Akroyd was on a "mission from God" as a blues brother). What haunts me is the thought that I may be fooling myself by constructing some sort of elaborate rationale that is clothed in nobility but that in essence is simply a Bohemian escape plan.

Your recent misadventure of having to be rescued from teetering over that cliff was a humbling experience. But it was an important one shared in by your helpful neighbors that strengthened the human bonds of friendship and confirmed that a little foresight in preparedness goes a long way. Also, having and developing this property is giving you purpose, something to do with yourself in your wise old age. That, in itself, is a great thing (if it doesn't kill you, that is).

Keep up the good work and the good fight. I look forward to getting there.

Hoping that I'm soon able and worthy enough for the undertaking,

Wednesday, November 7, 2018

Two Civil Wars Coming

“Billy” Eduard Albert Meier, Swiss ET contactee and author, made a prediction about two civil wars occurring in America, the first in 2020 and the second in 2024. http://www.theyfly.com/
 
With control of the House shifting to Democrats after the 2018 midterm elections Meier’s prediction is gaining traction for me. Now these slimy liars (Pelosi, Schiff, Waters, et al.) will show their true colors even more, with an effort to impeach President Trump and to block Trump’s legislative efforts to wrest the nation back from the Swamp, viz., the seditious infiltration of commie globalists.
 
Such a pushback will exacerbate tensions and widen the rift between patriots and traitors, between what is right and what is wrong for America—and by extension, the world. Had the Republicans retained control in the House things would have continued to simmer on a slow boil. But now the pot should boil over. If Meier is right, that boil-over should take just over a year or so.
 
In retrospect, this election result in the House had to be. Voting fraud by Democrats has been attenuated but not yet completely stamped out. This systemic corruption certainly exaggerated Democrat vote tallies (and representation). However, the bright side of this is that, due to their fraud and stolen elections more and more evidence is mounting for electoral reform; for requiring photo IDs, purging dead people from voter roles, and safeguarding the electoral process from other shenanigans, not the least of which is manipulation of computer votes via hacking and rigging.
 
It had to be this way. Now Americans will get a double dose of fraud from the Swamp creatures in Congress while the media propaganda machine and lefty corporate interests continue to cheer-lead them on. It will only heighten the awareness of their betrayal of the American People. Republican leaders and “woke folks” generally will, in turn, galvanize themselves all the more against the evil ways of an internal subversion that has rooted itself in our Republic since JFK was publicly slaughtered.
 
Sadly, it will take a civil-war-style purge to rebound as a nation intact. But Meier also predicts that America will lose its standing as a superpower. To me this would mean that there are very powerful foreign forces at work supporting the internal subversion that will cause great damage to the American population and infrastructure, eventually overcoming American military might. The karmic principle at work here is probably self-evident to all who have kept count of the injustices inflicted by USA, Inc. over the past half-century.
 
What toll a second civil war in 2024 will take is anybody’s guess. Justice will come in two waves. No one knows the fate of Donald Trump, the integral force behind this liberating new Movement of patriots. Depending on how soon we lose him will portend the outcome of the civil wars. I tend to doubt we will lose him soon. I hope not. Judging him by his actions, Trump is the best president America has had since Andrew Jackson. Blind and deluded citizens will meet their just ends as the pot boils over; patriots, too, will die, but not in vain! I long to witness the sword of Archangel Michael smiting Satan’s intelligence/psychiatric/AI loony bin.
 
If I’m still around in 2024 I will be 70 years-old. I’ll look back on this post then to see if I was prescient, believing in Meier’s predictions, my own reason and my gut sense. Whatever happens, oh human beans, get ready for some real wack-a-doodle trauma and, eventually, a great awakening!

Thursday, November 1, 2018

Dealings With My Blue-Pilled Family

NOTE TO READER:
Scroll down and read from bottom to top, as you would with any email string.
 
Jack wrote to all (except Fred, who voted early and asked me to stop sending him stuff):
10 Reasons Not to Vote
 
 
Jack wrote to Madeline: 
I’m happy for you to correct what you call my assumptions. However, if I have  formed an opinion or belief about anyone or anything it is always based on observable facts and an intuitive sensibility. If I am wrong I welcome whatever you offer to help me reassess whatever it is I have misinterpreted and misdiagnosed.
 
As for intra-family communication problems, those are always two-way. I dare say there are likely massive assumptions made about me by all of my siblings that are not accurate. And so I urge you to consider this before you take the high ground again and then fall back into self-referent ruminations on your work and your own therapeutic musings.
 
But I already doubt that this conversation will produce much in the way of understanding. I say that because my framework of reality and yours (and that of our siblings) are so radically different. I’ll listen, if you wish to tell me about yourself, which I think is more than you would offer me. I say this because the sense I get from your emails is that I am some sort of pathogenic entity that needs healing, instead of a whole individual who has chosen his own road-less-traveled but one that is just as viable none-the-less.
 
The only context you offer is my assumption that you loathe Christianity. Granted, “loathe” may have been too strong a descriptor. I might have phrased it differently, as in you all have rejected your Faith. Picking and choosing certain ethical guideposts that your Catholic upbringing provided to you is far from being a Christian who seeks to be true to the gospels of Jesus. Instead I see that you and your sisters have embraced a bundle of New Age diversions with perhaps some Buddhist overlays wrapped in a more secularist or modernist outlook. To me it has the flavor of spiritual materialism, but I don’t want to assume too much.
 
Your interpretation of Christ and being Christ-like in your daily life impresses me as being a good practice. I cannot agree more that being “up” and positive is preferable. What puzzles me is that this approach works best as long as you are moving in a circle within a bubble of your own comfort zone; step out of that and then what? It may provide support and foundational functioning in the world and it may not. We are always being tested and our experience is always undergoing re-evaluation. Humans are works-in-progress. The more we apprehend the more we must adjust our being to our "selves." I’d very much like to know how to face lunacy, injustice, violence and evil with a positive happy-face. Even Christ expressed righteous anger when throwing the money changers out of the Temple—even God rested on the seventh day.
 
All of this to say that your way, your path is fine for you but it’s your path; mine is different but not inherently or necessarily lesser. And I can do my own work, thank you. I don’t need you to do anything for me, Madeline. I have never asked you for much of anything, have I? And you know why? I’ve never seen you as a “giver.” And neither are my other siblings much good at being givers. It’s analogous to your sense that one must be in possession of oneself in a positive way in order to be of help to others—but “positive” in a more spiritual and charitable sense, I suppose.
 
So, I guess we better just forget trying to get anywhere with this… My writing is apparently too burdensome for you to even read, let alone to apply yourself in answering; and of course you must save your energy for your paying clients. I understand. My first response to your email: "Here's an email from my siblings with more than just a nonchalant shrug. It had some actual thinking and substance." When I encounter something like this I like to sit with it for a while and "ponder" it, perhaps re-reading it a few more times, giving myself some incubation time before formulating a response. I did this with an email that Claire sent me recently. I hope she shared that with you.
 
I know you do not wish me any harm Madeline and I do not mean to imply by this email that you do. But you must understand that I believe in myself as much as you do, with just as much passion and goodness, believe it or not.
 
Love,
Jack 
 
 
Madeline wrote: 
HI Jack-
I planned on responding to your email this morning.  With my schedule I didn't even have time to read it in full until today.  You probably are not aware, but when I work I see clients straight for 9 to 12 hours.  

I don't even know where to begin as far as a response.   In that email, you made so many assumptions that are not true.  It's no wonder there are communication problems between you and me--and you and the rest of the family.  I'm sorry if you saw my response to you as condescending.  I'm so amazed with all that I have learned and am learning (and EXPERIENCING) as far neuroplasticity in the brain that I want to share it with everyone.  I don't know what happened between your first response to my email and your second response to my email.  I suspect that initially you received it in the way I intended and in your second response you did too much thinking and assuming.  You created a negative narrative about me and my tone and intentions.  Negative assumptions like that create division instead of union.  I could go through and respond to the many things you said in your email but that would be a lot of work for me.  It feels like you want me to do your work for you-to prove myself to you.  I'm not interested in doing that.  You talk about our Catholic upbringing and you ASSUME that we have a loathing for it.  Where did that assumption come from?  I feel like I was able to cull many positive things from my Catholic upbringing.  As far as Christ, my view is that he was so loving of the goodness that is in all of us that people were healthy and whole when they were with him.  Everyday I start my morning with journaling about all of the people, things, events,  I appreciate; and sometimes I also meditate.  So when I go into my day I feel appreciative and loving and I have positive expectations.  Most of the time, my day flows smoothly and I have very satisfying and uplifting experiences with clients, family, strangers.  Now I feel like life is very  simple: when I awake in the morning-every morning-my intention is to feel loving and appreciative.  I'm aware that I will not always feel that way; and i'm aware that things will knock me off balance, but I always know how to realign myself.  I can't be of any help to my clients if I do not feel good.  I can also put this in Christian terms-and this was my thesis on the Canterbury Tales: in the Old Testament we followed God's commandments that came from outside of us.   In the New Testament we learn that we can internalize those commandments by connecting with that loving part of us-the law of love within.   That's all for now.  
 
Love,
Madeline
 

 
Jack wrote to Madeline:
No reply?
Vote Democrat:
Jack
 


Jack wrote to Madeline: 
Madeline,
 
After sparsely sparring with me, your comedic wit quickly gave way to the clinical approach and you offered neuroplasticity for what ails me. A bit condescending and presumptive yourself, don’t you think? That is, a pronouncement from on high (albeit well-intentioned) suggesting that I accept my siblings’ diagnosis that I am awash in hate and negativity and how I might cure myself in order to better cope, socially. I guess my “social credit score” has nose-dived, at least from the perspective of the family, to the “unacceptable” level. Of course that’s nothing new.
 
That first paragraph may sound condescending. But what if it is meant as a truthful observation, then what of it? By the way, I reviewed all of my comments in that last email string for condescending and presumptive language. I didn’t find much there. Though my remarks can be “biting” I would not classify them as you did. Do I respect my siblings? (I was a little rough on Susie and Jennifer.) I suppose that could make for an interesting topic, though bracketed for now.
 
I accept that there are effective treatment modalities for improving effectiveness in one’s career, better health, control and satisfaction in relationships, and contentment in general with one’s self in the world. I don’t doubt that self-training in neuroplasticity can be beneficial to get one out of a state of chronic negativity or depression. I recall you mentioning it before and I found it to be interesting. In fact, I had gotten myself into a real negative cul de sac early in my “research” (c. 2007-2012) as I uncovered tons of secret knowledge and assorted evil-doing. I found I had to stand back from that and be more cautious with my immersion, especially in exaggerated, unsourced, or speciously-sourced articles. In other words, I believe I was learning to hone my discernment ability and to place boundaries on my intuition and imagination (if the latter is possible, but I think you know what I’m trying to say).
 
Eventually, I brought myself out of my slough of despond and was ever on-guard afterwards against this sort of thing. Yes, you can become so entangled in conspiratorial thinking that your whole being gets all warped and mangled as you obsessively self-project outward onto the many boogeymen that are out there. I’m quite aware of this weird phenomenon. I had to learn the hard way via an experiential, heuristic-type of process. Is there some residual? Perhaps. When one studies areas that are by their nature occluded, hard evidence is often elusive, fragmentary, and circumstantial. (I have quite often wished that I had majored and specialized in symbology and art history like Dan Brown’s intrepid Prof. Robert Langdon character. But alas! I did not.)
 
All this to say that I still get carried away a bit by a righteous anger at the socio-cultural malaise that is upon us; that the people have essentially served (and daily offer themselves up) as guinea pigs of political engineering and corporate manipulation. To witness the harm it has done to us is to almost despair for the future. Instead, I find solace in my religio-spiritual convictions in the gospel of Jesus and the wisdom of the ages; in time-tested tradition topped off with a bit of psychonautical inner space exploration; in blues and Jimi Hendrix, as it were. Still, it is difficult to witness the many servitors of Mammon, witting and unwitting, of Earthly things, desires, in physical, mental and transhuman existence—all the while wondering just how I am really doing.
 
Currently. politics is at center stage, with the midterm elections just one week away. The family might extend some understanding of this and forgive me my trespasses, my exuberance and my excitement that maybe, just maybe we finally have a leader as solid as Andrew Jackson (who you refer to as a “buffoon”) and will finally get a motivated Congress behind him. If you think Trump is a buffoon then I seriously question how “well-informed” you are on his accomplishments to date. And if you are not well-informed, then neither will be your opinions.
 
Yes, we are each on his or her own path. I just find it hard to respect opinions that are so “Montgomery County.” Come up to Trump Country in Somerset, for example; drive a tractor-trailer through the Midwest and experience the friendly, “non-coastal, non-callous sophisticates” that live there; work in Asia and get a sense of what other places and cultures are like and what they have to offer (instead of the weak-kneed “multi-culturalism” foisted on Americans here); do some hard manual labor among Hispanics and less privileged whites—you’ll soon leave the Democrat “progressive” plantation, believe me.
 
My neural roadmap is less tied to the brain and inheres more in my Christian values. And candidly, one of the concerns that I have about my sisters (and Kip) is this new loathing you all have for the Faith of your upbringing in favor of dabbling in the occult, particularly in psychics and séances. As one who explored some more esoteric realms myself I can appreciate going down that road. However, it’s one thing to explore and another to be captivated. I heard rumors about the trip you all took to Ashville, NC recently. Of course none of you dare to share that with the likes of me or your other brothers. I wonder why. If you are worried about being mocked and derided you won’t get that from me. Instead I’d just like to know what you all discovered and find out why it is you are out there looking for such things. But I haven’t asked because it seems plain that it’s none of my business. All I know is that without a sound guide devoted to God, the occult can be a real bear trap.
 
And so, while I respect your paths (or group path) I don’t feel compelled to hold my tongue. I don’t think that I should pretend that I feel any other way than how I feel. I do try to be as courteous and sociable as I can. Respectful? I respect that you all have found your career paths and that you are courteous to me. But let’s face it, besides growing up together I find that I have very little else in common with any of my brothers and sisters. And none of you seem very interested in my life, my family, my interests, my books, my blogs, my spiritual or political beliefs—why pretend if there is not much of a sympatico there?
 
So, why do I email you what I find interesting? Am I trying to evangelize you all with my spiritual and “fascist” political beliefs? I guess I am and I suppose I shouldn’t. But I think it’s a natural tendency for one to want to share something of value with loved ones. And when that is ignored or rejected out-of-hand it’s more bad manners than anything else as far as I’m concerned. I try to ignore the benign neglect, probably as much as you all try to ignore my futile attempts to communicate insights into my world that I offer to you. I just keep forgetting that none of you are much interested in my world—or maybe you think I have an ulterior motive or I’m being pedantic—who knows? I’ll never really quite understand why that is. Sometimes I wonder if you all are envious (not of my poverty of course). Maybe I’ve just scared you all off just once too many times.
 
In any event, I don’t mean any of you any harm and I wish you all just the opposite. 

Love,
Jack 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jennifer wrote:
 
Did that comment make you feel good?  Apparently what Madeline said or what anyone has said to you went over your head. 
 
Jack wrote:
ATTN: Madeline
Therapist needed at 5706 Bradley
 
 
Jennifer wrote:
Jack, sadly you have no idea that Jane apologized to me before she died.  She told me that she realized she was wrong about me. You can only hope your siblings will feel the same about you some day, but this is highly doubtful. Regardless of the incredibly terrible things you've done to me, I'm still respectful toward you.  I would have thought you would have outgrown your desperate need to belittle others in your futile attempt to feel powerful. All of us have outgrown this so isn't it time to let go of your continual attempts at "fake power".  It inevitably has the polar opposite affect - that of a fool. 
 
Madeline wrote:
Now why did you have to be critical and judgmental? Can’t you just observe and move on without making judgments? Or better yet, find something to appreciate about Susie.  Maybe you don’t realize what you’re doing? I would like to give you the benefit of the doubt. 
 
Jack wrote:
Classic Susie: wait until the controversy subsides somewhat, then come in with conciliatory fluff (except with regard to me; of course I'm full of hate and negativity). Thanks for ever guiding us, oh tepid eldest!  
 
Susie wrote:
Well I finally had time to read the stream.  I miss Jane - it's a pain in my heart.  So hard to believe it's been 10 years!  I talk to her on my walks and sometimes when I meditate.  I feel she is there with support, guidance, and love.  I agree wholeheartedly with Fred and Madeline - not feeling able to express my distress about the negativity and hatred you espouse, Jack.  Instead of this, can we please unite in our love and missing of our Jane?  Can we love each other and accept that we are different, but still respect and support each other?
Love to you all,
Susie
 
Jack wrote:
Now there's something worth pondering.
Thank you, Madeline!
 
Madeline wrote:
Jack-
     What is most unacceptable about your attitude that shows through in what you write and send is that you have no respect for your siblings.  You are condescending and presumptive.  Just because we don’t engage in discourse with you does not mean that we are not well informed and that we don’t have opinions.
 
      If you want to engage with us, approach us with positive expectation and appreciation.  I had a dream about Jane about 5 years ago.  In the dream she came out from behind a curtain and she was beautiful and beaming and she held open her arms and said “aren’t you going to hug me”?  After that I started on a new path that enriched my life immensely-that’s when I started my Appreciation blog.  I learned about the neuroplasticity of the brain and discovered that if you spend time in negative states you create neural pathways in your brain so that it’s easier and easier to get into negative states and stay there.  Also, the more you stay in negative states the less healthy you are-your heart rate variability goes down and that sets off an avalanche of negative biological responses that eventually lead to disease.  So I have learned to practice being in positive states by writing about things that bring up positive states-and by meditating-thereby creating new neural pathways in the brain and constant high heart rate variability.  And the other benefits are I have created an internal locus of control meaning that no matter what happens I am resilient-I know how to return to my center and restore homeostasis;  I spend more time being Present with others which feels deeply satisfying.  This is why I can see 10 or 11 clients a day and feel energized all day long.  These practices have also led to deeper, loving connections with people, with Nature-but most importantly with myself.  Also, research shows that when you are in more positive states you’re more creative-you find solutions to problems more easily.  AND research shows that people (and animals) want to be around you when you’re centered, present and feeling love and appreciation. I realize that you are on your path and I respect that-you have had experiences that have led you to where you are today.  But just realize we are all on our own paths which have led us to make choices and decisions.  Start to notice the contrast of how you feel when you are being judgmental or critical to how you feel when you are appreciative and understanding.  Maybe that one practice will spark something for you. 
Love, 
Madeline
--------------------------------------------------------
BACKGROUND CONTEXT 
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 5:42 AM Jack wrote:
She had your number for sure, Jennifer. It's good you didn't end up hating her for that. 
 
Jack wrote:
Fred,
It's funny. Jane's blunt remarks to me were often offensive and made me feel sad. She never hesitated to say what she meant---and she meant what she said. She held strong opinions about a lot of things, including my own personal failings. So she was hard to take, but I took it and wrestled with it. And I think she helped me understand certain things about myself over time. She had a strongly inquiring mind that went in many directions---income tax, ETs, supplements, nutrition---and she saw through the phoniness Democrat servitor frauds. Like many researchers, she may have been taken in by disinformation trolls, but at least she was exploring vistas of knowledge and wisdom traditions that are out there and worth looking at. She was never one to shrink from doing anything either, like landscaping her property or rehabbing her house. That's what I miss about Jane and those are qualities I admire.
 
I'm full of political energy because that's what's happening out there right now as we come up to the most pivotal election since 2016. I always hope and pray that those closest to me will somehow wake up, or at least engage me on issues instead of mouthing platitudes and simply hating Trump based on nothing but irrational personal animus. I stopped sending you most stuff long ago, Fred, due to your benign neglect. How far that goes I'll never know.
Jack    
 
 

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 5:26 AM Jennifer wrote:
I agree with you Fred, we’ll put!  I find pennies all of the time and place them in cracks in the cherry wood owl sculpture in our front yard that we created in Jane’s honor. I miss her too!

 
Jack wrote to Kip:
Et tu Brute it is then.
 
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 7:44 AM Kip wrote to Jack:
Yes, Donald, let’s generalize about liberals so we can de-humanize them enough to hate them, and then maybe even kill them.  Hail the Fuhrer!!
 
Jack wrote to Kip:
Et tu, Kip?

 
On Oct 29, 2018, at 10:44 PM, Fred wrote:
 
Jack, I really find it offensive and sad that in a forum where we are honoring the memory of our sister Jane, that you feel the need to inject your political thoughts. This is totally unacceptable and I think we all know your political leanings.   If you support your candidate and his party, fine - Vote for your candidates. But this over zealous and obsessive ranting is off-putting.  You seem to see everything through a your political  prism and espouse hate and condescension toward any who don’t agree with you. Frankly, I am sick and tired of your extremist crusade.   Please stop sending me your political emails and videos.   I already voted in the midterm election.  I voted for candidates I feel  best represent my views. You remind me of a religious evangelist trying to convert people to your religion, or even worse, a fascist.
 
Enough is enough....
 
Fred

 
Jack wrote:
Now I'm seeing where Claire got her propensity toward cheer-leading.
 
 

On Oct 29, 2018, at 8:40 PM, Rosemary wrote:
So nice Fred!
 

On Oct 29, 2018, at 8:10 PM, Fred wrote:
Me too.  I see her dreams often. Sometimes in a dream I just feel her presence.  I guess that’s the twin connection.
 
 
 
Jack wrote:
Excuse me?
What planet are you on?
I'd say it's quite the other way around.
But then, you still watch TV.
I understand your disability.
Shall we consult our dead relatives?
Jane, come in, your sisters need help! (Lots of it...)
 
 
Madeline wrote:         
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 7:29 PM Madeline wrote:
Yes!! Like a Buffoon of a president made   Impotent by a democratic house and senate!!!
 
 
Jack wrote:
Oh, it's Madeline!
Glad to know you've left the Ouija board long enough to hint at the possibility of belief in something more "uplifting."
 
 
Jack wrote:
Emogi-speak?
Come on Rosemary, you can do better than that!
 
 
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 7:35 PM Rosemary wrote:
[four emoji smiling faces]😂😂😂😂

 
 
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 7:21 PM Madeline wrote:
I’m pretty sure that Jane now has an omniscient view and is therefore a Democrat. 😇
 

On Oct 29, 2018, 7:15 PM Kip wrote:
I did think about Jane yesterday, and politics did not cross my mind in the least.
Kip


On Oct 29, 2018, at 7:11 PM, Jack wrote:
Way ahead of her time
 

On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 7:07 PM Rosemary wrote:
My message is taken a detour.


On Oct 29, 2018, at 7:00 PM, Kip wrote:
Republicans have lost their way.

Kip


On Oct 29, 2018, at 6:27 PM, Jack wrote:
Jane would vote Republican if she were still alive today. For sure. And so should all of you---in her memory.

On Oct 29, 2018, at 5:57 PM, Rosemary wrote:

Yesterday was the 10 year anniversary of Jane’s death. I still find pennies in the oddest places and they always remind me of her.
I miss Jane so much!

Love,
Rosemary