Justices of the
U.S. Supreme Court (including judges of inferior federal courts and judges of
state courts), when applying the highest law of the land—as long as they stick
to the literal meanings of the words in the U.S. Constitution—are referred to
as “originalists”; they believe that
the Founding Fathers of the American Republic said what they meant and meant
what they said about life, liberty, justice; our unalienable rights, peaceably
governing ourselves, the pursuit of happiness—and they remain vigilant to
the notion that government is circumscribed in the Constitution to very specific
limitations. These are “non-activist”
judges who do not divine a “penumbra of rights” from rights explicitly
protected in the Bill of Rights. They apply
the law, instead of sliding down the slippery slope of interpreting the law.
Believers who
adhere to the literal meanings of words in the Bible are labeled “Christian literalists” or more pejoratively, “Christian fundamentalists”; they believe that the Bible’s divinely-inspired
writers said what they meant and meant what they said (construing that meaning
according to the original Hebrew and Greek, as the learned team of English translators did
in producing the King James Bible from 1604-1611), viz., that the Bible is, quite
literally, the Word of God (i.e., divinely inspired text). The slippery slope for believers occurs when
applying who we are as Christians to a myriad of fact situations as they inevitably
arise.
Such non-activist
jurists and fundamentalist believers are further labeled “conservative.” As such, they seek to “conserve” meaning and values. And what
does it mean to “conserve meaning and values”? One might surmise that once a nation and/or
a set of Christian believers establish and recognize Supreme Law, that that
rule of law is worthless and useless unless its time-tested traditions are lived, i.e., taught, acted upon, defended,
protected—conserved not only for the current generation, but preserved for
posterity.
Traditionalists
are not pharisaic, in the worst sense of the word, i.e., knowing the
law yet exhibiting false righteousness, thoughtless form over substance, and preaching
an extreme legalism yet one based upon a lax morality; being hypocritical,
two-faced.
Sessions 13:
Begin at the
26:00 minute mark
The state can be thought of as reaching a righteousness of
form with the founding of the American Republic. America in the late Eighteenth
Century was a grand experiment in seeing whether a People could split off from
the Deep State of British/European intrigues-and-control to form a more perfect
union of self-governing (mini)states composed of sovereign individuals. Although
the nation has survived it has morphed into more of a national security state
of apparatchiks, bound up with the globalist “personhood” of multi-national corporate
minions, manned by a dumbed-down population of servitors who find themselves subject
to a socio-spiritual miasma subversion. Can it be said that what has happened to
the Republic since its founding has been the result of a creeping, “secular
Pharisee-ism”?
·
Just look at the so-called “impeachment circus” of 2019.
Democrat libtards and RINOs persecuting POTUS and anyone who defends him;
· Liberals who accept “the news” reported by mainstream
media as representing “the truth” and close their minds to arguments to the
contrary. (This is practicing a modern-though-secularist form of Pharasee-ism—or
more precisely, a form of Saducee-ism,
the liberal side of ancient rabbinic law-keepers);
·
Attorneys seeking the acquittal of their clients (or
punishment of adversaries), argue “technicalities” or make specious legal arguments
hoping only to provide—for a like-minded “judge”—an opening by which that judge
can make an unjust ruling (or lead a gullible jury toward an unjust verdict);
· Pharmaceutical company operatives who provide a wealth of
“scientific evidence” in support of a drug, from “clinical studies” they
funded, or otherwise influenced, and from which they intend to profit
handsomely. The drug ends up killing or damaging people for life. These
companies may be using medical terminology and “scientific” procedure but the form prevails over the true spirit of healing.
Then there were Franklin Roosevelt’s 1933 actions of (1) bankrupting America via HJR 192,
prompting the national government to
(unconstitutionally) repudiate its promises to redeem paper currency with gold who
(2) looked to the Trading with the Enemy Act as amended by the War Powers Act
of March 9, 1933, to empower the federal government to take control over any
and all commercial, monetary or business transactions of We the People—We, the
newly declared “enemy,” which quite literally turned our nation into a USA, Inc.
The roots of government oppression, via inordinately high taxation, is traced even further back to Shays' Rebellion, 1786-1788. Michael Hoffman writes trenchantly about this righteous revolution led by farmers and laborers in Western Massachusetts in his Revisionist History newsletter, Issue No. 105, Oct,-Nov. 2019. Many were men who had served in the Continental Army to free us from British tyranny. Their complaints went unanswered. Instead, they were crushed without pity by America's new military forces under the strong-arm influence of the government and legal fraternity in league with financial and mercantilist interests—an all-too-familiar dark alliance of usurious money-lovers.
A story comes to mind. "At the close of the
Constitutional Convention of 1787, as he left Independence Hall on the final
day of deliberation—in the notes of Dr. James McHenry, one of Maryland’s
delegates to the Convention—a lady asked Dr. Franklin, ‘Well, Doctor, what
have we got: a republic or a monarchy?’ ‘A republic,’ replied the Doctor, ‘if
you can keep it’. (McHenry’s notes were first published in The American
Historical Review, vol. 11, p.618 (1906). When McHenry’s notes were
included in The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, ed. Max
Farrand, vol. 3, appendix A, p. 85 (1911, reprinted 1934), a footnote stated
that the date this anecdote was written is uncertain." Source: Bartelby’s
Quotations, https://www.bartleby.com/73/1593.html Retrieved on 12/2/2019, slightly reformatted for readability.)
Let’s
see if we can rise above Benjamin Franklin’s foreboding suspicions and keep it a republic.
Keeping the Faith—in
God and Country
There is
tremendous value in knowing what it means to be a Christian. By this I mean
truly grokking the Bible, and by so doing really knowing, inviting, and keeping Jesus Christ
in our hearts. Surprisingly, perhaps, this uncommon knowledge is quite a “ramble
into the esoteric”; it is more than just a path of “gimmee that old time
religion,” though that may suffice quite well as a beginning and an endpoint
for most Christian believers. But drop what you are doing and hear me, for there
is always more to explore in the subtle realms. And if we have a mind to do so,
then let us do it.