USA, Inc., of Thee I Lament.

 

Are There Really TWO U.S. Constitutions?

 

Just as American Intelligence Media relates in the above link to their audio essay, attorney Karen Hudes asserts that we've been under a covert constitution since 1871. (See, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sx65bnsc3zo ;  also see , generally, http://3rddog.weebly.com/blog )

Enjoy a new website/blog just out that goes in depth on this and much more:

http://www.internallydisplacedpeople.org/joomla30/index.php/voices

And we must not forget to mention the AntiCorruption Society:

https://anticorruptionsociety.com/2016/03/08/constitutional-bar-attorneys-are-gaslighting-americans/

 

Attorney Mel Stamper has written that America has been under martial law since the time of Lincoln (c. 1861) and/or in a state of declared national emergency since 1933 (A Lawsuit is an Act of War; and, Fruits from a Poisonous Tree (2008).

 

For years I've heard various folks proclaim that courts are actually operating under Admiralty Law and the Uniform Commercial Code; that federal common law is dead (since Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938)?)

 

There is also much talk about the "strawman" (E.g., see http://natureofthecage.com/—documents that use all capital letters—that we should use phrases such as "I do not wish to contract," or "I waive the benefits privilege," in order to defeat citations and other attempts to bring us in "under their jurisdiction," and so on.

 

I used to wish that some enterprising young law student would publish a law review article exposing and explaining this whole "alternative law" thing, toward a finding of whether or not it has any merit. (I believe it has.)  Some years ago I did a search to see whether anyone had published such an article, and I didn't find anything. I suppose I should check again. If I wasn't so overwhelmed by the topic I might have done it myself by now. But I do not think any accredited law school would dare to publish an article that debunks the very raison d'etre for that school's existence. (If I'm wrong, someone please let me know and direct me to such a law review article.)

 

Have a look at this article: http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/58102/

Its premises and tenor are outlandish...but...is it true? 

 

In this false age anything is possible. It took me over fifty years to finally wake up. Now I don't know what is true and correct anymore, except that my own moral compass guides me and prompts me to ask questions when I am bewildered. So forgive me if I seem befuddled, betwixt and between. I sometimes think it doesn't matter anymore—at my age I'm content to find a warm fire to sit by and some old scrappy memories of happier times to comfort me. The world can go to hell (it probably already has—in fact, maybe it is hell). Yes, perhaps The Fugs were right—the world's all a lotta "NOTHING": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UskDupcLM0M

 

Here is a re-posted article that I pose as a further example of what I am talking about when I refer to "alternative law":

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How to beat the courts and other knowledge

This is from my document How to beat the courts and other knowledge. The complete document is on my Facebook page. What to do and not do at court. Do not use any language in any of your documents other than your own language. (No Latin or French, unless you speak it.)

#1: The most effective thing you can do is make a claim. (For example – “i man claim that because you have trespassed on my human rights i have jurisdiction over you. Is there any man or woman here who challenges this claim?” “No, then my claim stands in law and in fact.” “i hereby require all charges to be discharged without prejudice. (Without any loss or waiver of rights or privileges.) The lawyers, judge, court clerk or bailiff will not challenge any claim you make when worded like that, because they are not man or woman. i know from first-hand experience that they will not say anything. A claim that is unchallenged, stands as law. When your claim stands, you must say “No man or woman challenges my claim, so my claim stands.” When a judge takes off his or her robe in court, that judge is now operating under the Common Law. Use that time to make all lawful claims again. Judges can be tricky when it comes to doing this. They will adjourn their other court or take a recess first, and just make it look as though they are just getting comfortable. Don’t be fooled, take advantage of this as soon as it happens.

#2: If someone does not have firsthand knowledge the case they cannot testify. The prosecuting attorney almost never has firsthand knowledge. Point this out to the judge and get a ruling on it.

#3: If a defense attorney tells you they are representing you, ask them if they are an attorney or a lawyer. Attorneys do not need to know the law. They are not required to know the law. If they don’t know the law then they are committing fraud. Also never give your name or identify yourself to an attorney or lawyer, doing so creates an adhesion contract with them and the court.

#4: If you are talking to the judge, ask him/her if he/she is speaking to you man/woman to man/woman. This can establish Common Law, but you have to know how to keep it.

#5: Do not use their codes and statutes. Remember they can change their codes fast and they are not your codes, so you cannot interpret them or use them.

#6: Always act as a man or woman; never act as a LEGAL person. Unless you see a benefit and you know how to do it right.

#7: Hold your own court either under Common Law or your own laws. If you wish you can adapt the laws i created for my tribe, to create your own laws. If you hold your own court, you can say to the judge “i will hold you liable for any harm that you do to me.”

#8: Remember only a man/woman can make a claim, a State cannot.

#9: If they say they have rules against something, and they are talking to you, and not the legal fiction ask them what their rules have to do with you, since you are not employed by their corporation and you are not in THEIR legal society. Remember, their courts are private courts, they are owned by the BAR.

#10: If a cop or a judge gives you an order, tell them to put it in writing and sign it. Also inform them how much it will cost them for you to fulfill that order, and that they must pay up front. If you find yourself at one of their courts, you can simply say to them that you do not speak their language. They speak legalese, not English. Even if they say something as simple as “remove your hat”, you do not know what they are saying. (Translation of “remove your hat” is “we want jurisdiction over you”). Do not respond to them. Tell them you do not speak their language and if they wish to communicate with you, then they must speak plain English and any proceedings must be in the Common Lore. (Lore is pronounced “Law”) #11: At court watch out for titles. Do not let them call you Mr. or Mrs. (Mr. is a title for an employee or peasant. Mrs. is an abbreviation for mistress). #12: If they try to appoint an attorney, tell them “i do not wish an attorney at this time”, keep telling them that whenever they ask you if you want an attorney. The Judge cannot sentence you unless you have representation. Do not represent yourself either.

#13: Remember that a Common Law Court is really a Court of Common Law. Always call it a Court of Common Law not a Common Law Court. #14: If you go through that little gate in the court room, be sure to tell them that such an action does not constitute a contract.

#15: In your writings try never to use a capital “I” when referring to yourself.

#16: There are 3 crowns/jurisdictions to THEIR courts. Templar Crown/Banking, English Crown/Admiralty, Imperial Crown (Holy Roman Empire)/Canon Law.

#17: All of their codes (For their Templar Crown jurisdiction.) have to refer back to Statutes at Large*, so if they are saying you are violating a code, tell them that is impossible. Maybe what they really mean to imply is that you are violating a Statute at Large. (That is if you are not using the method of simply not understanding a word they are saying.)

  *From >>> https://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/lwsl.html The United States Statutes at Large, commonly referred to as the Statutes at Large, is the official source for the laws and resolutions passed by Congress. Publication began in 1845 by the private firm of Little, Brown and Company under authority granted by a joint resolution of Congress. In 1874, Congress transferred the authority to publish the Statutes at Large to the Government Printing Office, which has been responsible for producing the set since that time. Every law, public and private, ever enacted by the Congress is published in the Statutes at Large in order of the date of its passage. Until 1948, all treaties and international agreements approved by the Senate were also published in the set. In addition, the Statutes at Large includes the text of the Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, the Constitution, amendments to the Constitution, treaties with Indians and foreign nations, and presidential proclamations.

#18: Remember to put everything in writing, and give it to the judge and/or prosecutor depending on what it is. You need a special notice to the court, stating that you are a man/woman, that you are holding your own court (if you can, keep a record of your courts proceedings and/or someone to act as the court recorder), also state you are not the defendant, you are not acting as surety for any bond and any action anyone takes against you, that man/woman will be held liable for in your court. And if they try to force you to take a on a defense attorney, then that attorney must assume all liability. Put it in writing. Get everything you can in writing. Also you can just say “i do not require an attorney at this time.” and keep saying that, whenever they try to force an attorney on to you. You can use the following notice as something like a template for if you are arrested. Remember it has to be in writing and if you are arrested be sure to tell the cop it is legal paperwork for court, they have to let you keep it on you. Also don't forget to date it and autograph it. Your notice should only be titled Notice, even though it is a notice to the court do not put on it Notice to the Court, it has to be a general notice, so it will be filed with the case. Also make this into multiple notices if you can. Each statement a separate notice and be sure to date and autograph each one. Notice i, man [thunder bear of the courage family] am here by special appearance. i, man [thunder bear of the courage family] state that my being at any location in this courthouse does not constitute a contract. i, man [thunder bear of the courage family] hold forth my own court at this time. Anything you do to me that causes me harm, loss and/or injury to my property, i will hold you accountable for. i, man [thunder bear of the courage family] am here to remedy any and all lawful and verifiable claims made against me. i, man [thunder bear of the courage family] require any man or woman who is making a claim that i have caused harm, loss or injury to appear before this court immediately or this case must be discharged in its entirety.

                                                                                         

The laws of Congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states

"The laws of Congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government," -- Caha v. United States, 152 U.S., at 215 "We think a proper examination of this subject will show that the United States never held any municipal sovereignty, jurisdiction, or right of soil in and to the territory, of which Alabama or any of the new States were formed," -- 44 U.S., at 221 "[B]ecause, the United States have no constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction, sovereignty, or eminent domain, within the limits of a State or elsewhere, except in the cases in which it is expressly granted," -- 44 U.S., at 223 "Alabama is therefore entitled to the sovereignty and jurisdiction over all the territory within her limits, subject to the common law," -- 44 U.S., at 228, 229; Pollard v. Hagan, 44 U.S. 221, 223,

  NOTE: Extracted from http://www.project.nsearch.com/

----------------------------------------------

 

Go figure, See what I mean? I am left dumbfounded. (Also see, http://presscore.ca/two-constitutions-in-the-united-states-1st-was-illegally-suspended-in-favor-of-a-vatican-crown-corporation-in-1871)

 

And here's another unsettling diatribe entitled, Rat Roping and the Global Currency Reset, by Anna Von Reitz (another big name in "alt-law" circles):

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2017/07/rat-roping-and-the-global-currency-reset-3530160.html

 

But then there is this audio interview with learned mensch Catherine Austin Fitts wherein she talks about getting back to following "the Constitution." Never is there any mention of any sort of dilemma concerning two constitutions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TkYa34hEpk

 

Where's that Fugs CD? 

NOT-SO-SECRET SOCIETIES

Those of us who have not sold out to any particular ideology or guidance system offered by not-so-secret-societies (i.e., we who are “not of the body”) find ourselves highly frustrated and irritated. How in the world can we ever know the inner workings of so many competing not-so-secret-societies that are behind the machinations of the “deep state,” and that vie to distract us from ourselves?

Specifically, how do we sort through not-so-secret-societies to determine who-is-who and is leading us to what particular ends?  One source claims that 100 secret societies prove who really runs America:

http://truthstreammedia.com/2017/05/27/100-secret-societies-prove-really-rules-america/

 

Despite the possibilities, here are the leading contenders that are most often suspected:

 

Templars

Freemasons

Illuminati

Rosicrucians

Jesuits

—and how do the following players figure into this mish-mash?:

 

Intelligence and security agencies worldwide

neo-Nazis (the real National Socialists vs. the Swiss Octogon Templar variety vs. the Hollywood version)

Judaic supremacist extremist Zionists and neo-cons

the Vatican

New World Order corporatists

Pharaonic “blue blood” royalty

 

Have a listen here: 

https://aim4truth.org/2017/02/18/anonymous-patriots-exclusive-interviews/

 

Even further down the poophole— consider these occultist/esoteric groups:

 

Kabbalists

neo-Platonists

Sufis

adherents to Zen and the Tao

Satanists/ Luciferians

How can we know anything anymore with any degree of certainty? With moorings all but gone—education, religion, media, all replaced by propaganda—wherein we are more dependent than ever on the web to be able to discern truth from horse feathers—how do we know we know what we know is true and correct?

Maybe, to one degree or another, we are lemmings, sheep being continually led by the nose down one garden path to the next by not-so-secret-societies—even as we mock others for being asleep and gullible. That is, just when we think we really know what’s going on in the world and understand how the world really works, we suddenly must stop, second-guess ourselves, and re-assess what we believe to be real.

 

Perhaps we are in a consciousness cul-de-sac, chasing our tails as we churn amid consensual reality and culture trance. But describing things with such sexy catch-phrases does not fully explain things or offer a solution for busting out of a matrix that has been slyly engineered to keep human beings from self-realizing their immense power and sovereignty.

 

I have written off all leftists, i.e., liberals, the so-called “progressives.” They have a mental disorder induced by cultural Marxism. Yes, I waive off this whole leftist ideological spectrum. Dare I call myself a “conservative,” when that moniker has been co-opted by Republicans-in-name-only (RINOs)? Or a Libertarian, when there are just as many problems with that ideology as being an anarchist?

 

Probably the best description of my political self is that I believe in the time-tested, traditional values and mores to which humans have aspired since time immemorial. This is much more than “political”—it is a lifeway, as much spiritual as political; it is a consciousness that is trans-cultural and Truth-seeking; it embraces love, the Good and the Beautiful, while using laser-like mental faculties and deeply intuitive sensibilities to flesh out reality and to reject their antitheses. It stands for justice. It rejects political systems in preference to rule by those whose merits have been proven in the fire of experience as worthy, regardless of ruling form.

 

I am speaking of standing in solidarity with “indestructible Tradition,” which is defined and discussed by Julius Evola (1898-1974): A tradition instilled and practiced by an individual who, with the aid of organizations and institutions aligned with traditional civilization and society, realizes himself completely, defends the principal values he recognizes as his own, and structures his life in a clear and unambiguous way. Evola identifies the type of human being capable of “riding the tiger”—an individual who can transform destructive processes into inner liberation—and, in so doing, offers hope to those who wish to reembrace Tradition. Evola, J., Ride the tiger: A survival manual for the Aristocrats of the Soul, (trans. by Joscelyn Godwin and Constance Fontana, 2003, Inner Traditions; Rochester, VT); orig. pub. as Cavalcare la Tigre, ©1961-2000, Edizioni Mediterranee, Rome.

 

On the brink of overwhelm, I came across a website that looks very promising: Aim4Truth.org  NOTE: A “Former Jesuit” is involved. Might be problematic.

 

Go and see what’s offered there. Play their "Glass Bead Game." Anonymous patriot citizen journalists can make a difference. As I wade into this milieu, I do so with the above overwhelm about how to know we know what we know is true and correct.

WHY DOTH THE DONALD RAGE?

Instead of looking to “bomb the shit” out of (((terrorists))), our fearless leader should take out the enablers who created, armed, funded and directed them. He need look no further than the unholy alliance of deep state American intelligence, Talmudic Israeli Mossad, the Wahhabist House of Saud, Qatar and Turkey. There are undoubtedly others, but these constitute the head of the viper.

 

The bombing of Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria and Yemen has enraged and hardened Muslims to hate the U.S. with a hyper-vengeance. They hate us for killing their families, their friends; they hate us for ruining their countries with depleted uranium that continues to mutate countless lives—and they hate our seemingly amoral secularized culture, represented easily by those shaved headed, wrap-around sunglass-wearing, techno-killers that have stalked their neighborhoods ever since the pretext of the 9-11 false flag operation gave them a green light.

 

It’s the easiest thing in the world for Talmudic-Wahhabist-corporatist servitors to capitalize on the pure hatred we have engendered in the Muslim world. Just offer Muslim malcontents refuge and hope that they can get their jihad on by channeling them into a private army of zealot-butchers. That’s what our rogue CIA had offered to the mujahedeen fighting the Soviets. (The CIA in fact originally built the tunnels in Afghanistan that the U.S. has just destroyed with its MOAB.) And the culprits named in the opening paragraph above have continued to nurture (((terrorism))) ever since, molding their “armed rebels” to whatever Zio-Sunni-petro-nation ends they choose.

 

Surely the intelligence that the White House gets is as good as any researcher can deduce from a discerning scan and read of certain websites, such as https://aim4truth.org/, http://stateofthenation2012.com/, or even https://www.intellihub.com/, http://www.breitbart.com/, or http://www.zerohedge.com/  and http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ .

 

So, Donald, fight the good fight by coming clean with the American people and the world. Don’t insult us by mouthing a lie about President Assad mounting a chemical attack on his own people—on “babies”—or Russia being complicit in such an inane and horrid hoax. Don’t betray the populist trust, especially in such a blatantly stupid way. Sure, attenuate invader immigration and go after jihadist scum masquerading as Muslims. But don’t fail to cut off the head of the viper that manages and controls them.

 

Supporters of the supposed anti-System president do not want to see you surrounded by neo-con con men creeps and their corrupted Pentagon groupies. Rid yourself of the vestigial corpus luteum that has surrounded the presidency at least since the time of Woodrow Wilson. Instead, embrace your natural inclination toward Jacksonian ways. Be tough out in the world, be rough but right; be intelligent about kicking ass—don’t be a Zio-cowboy pushing a Greater Israel agenda, wittingly or unwittingly.

 

On a simple, visceral level, one can judge your recent military adventurism by the winks and nods from those cultural Marxist Democrats and Establishment pimps that constitute the antithesis of the Trump revolution. Truly we must ask these morons: Why doth the heathen rage? However, don’t continue to be their fool or we all may be asking, “Why doth the Donald rage?”

 

And while you’re at it (if the world can last), go out and attack the Federal Reserve System, Hitlery Pantsuit and all of the entrenched Obamacist traitors within the government (especially the Israeli-firsters)—get your family the hell out of the White House. Keep Steve Bannon by your side. Drain the Swamp and purge the American soil of anti-populist globalist goblins. Stop your f***ing around, dude, and stick to your campaign promises; build upon the profile you model of the new rugged individual!

DONALD, WE HARDLY KNEW YE ('til you wacked Syria)

Donald Trump had my support from the get-go—in spite of his impoverished vocabulary and lackluster oratorical skills. When he won the presidential election there was an immense sigh of relief that at least Hitlery Pantsuit had been put down. And as he ascended the throne, amid the crude cacophony of leftist name-calling and an unremitting gnashing of teeth (then and ever since), I felt vindicated but pissed by the outrageous disrespect and lies hurled at our new fearless leader—the first since JFK to buck of the System whole hog.

 

On April 6, with the barrage of Tomahawk missiles fired upon Syria, that support of Trump has fizzled. I was fine with his treatment of our neighbors to the south and north, but was already questioning his foreign policy leadership on a number of overseas fronts, namely:

 

1.      His appointment of Ms. Haley as another Russian-bashing, distastefully impolitic ambassador to the U.N.;

2.      His remarks about Russia coming to its senses and “returning Crimea”;

3.      His continuation of the provocative NATO build-up of troops in Poland and the Balkans;

4.      His siding with Wahhabist Saudi Arabia over Shia Yemen and Iran and a Shia-leaning, more tolerant, Alawite sect of Islam to which President Bashar al-Assad of Syria professes his faith;

5.      His very public saber-rattling and sanctions against Iran seems right out of the Israeli-Mossad playbook; and

6.      The aggressive ex-generals he has put in charge of everything from domestic intelligence to the Defense Department seem hell-bent on waging endless Neo-con falsities, wars, and continuing foreign entanglements.

 

This latest false flag chemical gas attack seemingly was swallowed by Trump and his war-hawks hook, line and sinker. What proof did they provide to the American people that Assad was in fact behind this dastardly deed? And now Trump has done an about-face on Syria; by illegally and unconstitutionally interfering in the affairs of that sovereign nation—something he formerly condemned Obama for doing—he has begun a conflagration that cannot end well.

 

Long-suffering Syria was just now coming close to peace and stability. With the strategic help of Russia, the terrorist proxies were being extinguished there by its duly elected and popularly supported President Assad and the patriotic troops loyal to the Syrian government. Any clear-thinking person would be dubious about an “Assad-assisted chemical attack” that would risk all of the hard-won gains made so far in the war against the horrid scourge of these proxy terrorist groups plaguing his people (and driving them into Western Europe with the generous help of Soros-funded groups).

 

Trump has committed a grievous wrong. He has violated international law and has now emboldened the terrorist proxies in Syria. Worse, he has played into the hands of the war-profiteering corporate elite and Judaic supremacist extremists with their expansionist agenda for a “Greater Israel” in the Middle East.

 

My Christian grandparents emigrated from Lebanon at the turn of the 20^th Century. They had the foresight to see the handwriting on the wall even before the founding of the modern criminal state of Israel further fanned the flames of religious, sectarian hatred.

 

Donald Trump is relying on those Zio-Jews who are close to him in his family and who are rampant throughout his administration to concoct a foreign policy that is Israel-first and America-last. This is a betrayal of Trump’s America-first promise to We the People and a complete abandonment of the Founding Father’s warning to steer clear of foreign entanglements.

 

Like many other Trump supporters, I have been patiently waiting for Trump to “drain the swamp” of those who do not have the best interests of the country as their prime directive. Mostly this means careerist Zio-bureaucrats and their leftist and phony conservative stooge servitors embedded throughout the government of the United States. Instead of ranting on Twitter about the fake news and other distracting nuisances, how about taking some strong, deliberate action where it really counts: CLEAN HOUSE in the State Department, the Defense Department, the Justice Department, EPA, the FBI, CIA, NSA, and so on, so that the same Systemic cronies are not leading the country astray, as has been the case throughout the Bush-Clinton-Obama years.

 

As things stand today, I have gone from being a supporter of President Trump to feeling absolutely ambivalent toward a figurehead who has duped himself, and worse—denied the People—of a president of integrity and independence who embodies true American leadership. Wise up soon, Donald Trump, or end up on the trash heap of history where others end up who have been misguided by elitist, plutocratic, Rothschildean, anti-populist, occult-Luciferian, pedophiliac, blackmailing puppet-masters.    

☼¤☼

Jack Suss aka Wyman Wicket,  http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/WyWi23 ,

examines and questions the world’s artificial constructs, seeking out those individuals and entities who are non-aligned with the System (i.e., not fatally compromised or co-opted into false consciousness). Recently he has published an intellectual autobiography of his last 25 years, Plight of the Cultural Mutant; and two thought-bomb, sci-fi tales: 23 Skiddoo—Way Back Beyond Across the Stars (2016) and Time Tweaking (2017).

TIME TWEAKING

 

In Wicket’s second thought-bomb sci-fi tale, two red pill compatriots plumb the noospheric depths. Sam Whent, the protaganist, travels to Thailand to enlist the support of his more tech-savvy friend, Bill Mansard, who has retired there. Together they build a time-travel helmet that facilitates their ability to astral travel to the akashic record, the “repository of all that has come before.”
 

Sam’s journal documents the misadventures of his six-week Thai daze. And as their stress builds, these two friends take refuge in the calming balm copiously offered there by the fairer sex. Both prurient and astral activities give rise to reflective digressions by Sam as the duo slogs through the trenches together.

 

To order your copy click onto: http://www.wymanwicket.com/buy/

 

The lads find that they can actually insert themselves into the akashic record, sometimes in a most lascivious manner. They then devise a plan to intervene and tweak unfolding past events so as to “back-formulate” history, hoping to bring about a better future—i.e., a world that has not hi-jacked and robbed humanity of its optimal potential. These amateur inner space explorers find out the hard way that they can change but not quite control the course of history—that’s a job long dominated by professional controllers (as Sam knows all too well).

 

Yes, two horn-dog, red pill compatriots invent a time travel helmet. 

 

Where would you go if you were able to easily untether your astral body and direct it to any historical event in the akashic record—if your hope is to tweak a crucial point in history that will have a far-reaching future effect? 

 

These lads plan to rid the planet of a depraved neo-Marxism that has degenerated the West in the guise of a “progressive,” globalist, NWO con game of open borders, “diversity and multiculturalism,” and political correctness. But dangers lurk in the noosphere and in unintended consequences of their “time tweaking.”

To order your copy go to: http://www.wymanwicket.com/buy/

23 Skiddoo: Way Back Beyond Across the Stars

486 pgs.     

Published:  May 5, 2016 

Available as an ebook, paperback or hardcover:

http://www.wymanwicket.com/buy/

Genre: Hybrid 

MetaPolitical Non-Fiction (in the guise of a) Thought-Bomb Sci-Fi Thriller

 Copyright © 2016 by Wyman Wicket

Read a review of the book at:

http://www.paranoiamagazine.com/2016/05/23-skiddoo-way-back-beyond-across-stars-wyman-wicket/

             Introduction

The lamp of reason does not dictate but serves three characters, who fall in together by happenstance. Each of the characters has waded into the cesspool of cowardly parasitism known as the System, comprised of Establishment and anti-Establishment. A rag-tag alliance unfolds that lays open the secret strength of the material world and the powers of a bodiless inner world; subconscious life-forces and supra-conscious spirit-forces illuminate reciprocal dimensions and set them to work; reality is a diabolic lie disseminated by (generally well-paid) half-wits, and the protagonists attack its self-imposed limitations, its exploitation of its own conscious debility that passes for virtue.  Thanatos is the elixir drunk by Earthlings unaware of their own deadened state. As bringers of eros (and as Muses for post-modernist truth-tellers), extraterrestrials are most unwelcome on planet Earth. The ruling globalist gang of bureaucrats has turned the planet into a dehumanization project. Celestial, agape forces are called upon to battle an Illuminati-type agenda. Our protagonists are the antiheroic heroes whose abnormative tickles are the impetus for unhinging the planetary chaos of an obsolete and dangerous consciousness; revolutionary cultural mutants who arm the masses with creative and imaginal thought-bombs.

Sos, the main sleuth/protagonist, inhabits a worldview with neo-primitivist propensities laced with inklings of aliens and an abiding sense that “everything fits together.” He is a supernaturalist and the aliens are symptomatic of that supernaturalism. Of course, there are some real aliens in play, so his intuitions are somewhat on the mark.

Next is Ex, a hyper-naturalist and nihilist that one might construct after reading the book Nihil Unbound. Everything has already happened and everyone is always already dead. There is merely the endless churning of matter, and mind is no more than an epiphenomenon, the echo of the last door closing in an empty amphitheater. But Ex is also something of a postmodernist, and even a dead man needs to make a living. So he designs worldviews for the hapless masses. Styling himself as something of a charismatic sociopath (along the lines of those who manage the present apocalypse) he cynically crafts worldviews like exotic flowers to adorn the hair and “heads” of the dead. He assumes all worldviews revolve on a fundamental denial of the fact that we are all already dead, perky zombies unable to face our own rank decay. In any case, he comes into contact with Sos, who needs help tweaking his own worldview and is writing a book on the subject, and who also wants to connect with others who think “outside the paradox box,” i.e., people who might come seeking Ex’s epistemological expertise—and the adventures begin.

A third sleuth, Ivan, is a hold-over Russian spy who went rogue after the fall of the USSR. He is a Marxist at heart, still committed to proletarian revolution, and is also an anthropological architect who has built up an intricate network of organizations to serve his spying—an insane asylum, a few cults, a prostitution ring, an ecstasy dispensary, and a hash den in the LA suburbs. Indeed, both the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service and the CIA would like to eliminate him, but they have a scant understanding of his organizations or his whereabouts. Ivan’s work as a seasoned, master spy, has also brought him in contact with real aliens. They consider him to be the da Vinci of social constructs among Earthlings and even occasionally employ him to help them craft various Illuminati red herrings and so on. Ivan, in turn, consults occasionally with Ex to get worldview ideas for his constructions. Ivan enjoys a tactical advantage due to the fact that he has been genetically altered and has a certain capacity to reshape his appearance.

23 Skiddoo: Way Back Beyond Across the Stars chronicles one crazy, long, hot summer in the life of Nathaniel Sos—a scruffy, beach-loving searcher for secret knowledge—as he rubs up against two worlds: one that hates, misconstrues or suspects him, and another that loves, guides and supports him. With the impetus of a special patron, Sos sets out to write The Cultural Mutant’s Guide to Consensual Reality and Culture Trance. In so doing he draws on his vast reservoir of prior research and writing. But a chance encounter puts him squarely in the center of an ultra-secret project and on the radar of intelligence agencies.

 At the behest of Sos’ benefactor, Ex and Ivan join forces with Sos and they metasticize into social terrorists in a world gone bland. They are, of course, a provocation to the System—a System that Sos is forever critiquing. Ex finds Sos’s critiques more palpable and more reliable than most of his clients’ worldviews; Ivan helps by guiding, in appropriate directions, Sos’ haphazard and self-choreographed way forward.

This rag-tag “team” of sleuths, aided by extraterrestrial and celestial advisors, arm Sos with the requisite knowledge, wisdom and confidence to negotiate his way clear of difficulties. In the process, our main protagonist is initiated into esoteric realms he had long intuited but, until now, was unable to confirm, access, and explore.

This is the story of a would-be sufi—a stumblebum and bluesman—a lovable sub-genius[1]—whose reverence for authentic experience, Jimi Hendrix, Love, Truth and Liberty, drive his dedication to debugging the big questions.

Through social critique, 23 Skiddoo riffs on the oppressive efforts of a parasitical, controlling elite to keep the world’s mind-controlled citizen-serfs in a perpetual state of “dissociation.”[2] In the book’s semiotic jumble of deduction, inference, parable, metaphor, and lucid dreamscapes, one may detect a new consciousness beginning to bud and blossom. This consciousness is steeped in tradition and adaptive to current circumstances; it is nothing short of a tapping into that flow of universal “juice”—a spiritual life force having the capacity to help us recall our true human potential, transform us, and release humanity from this prison planet, as it reaches way back beyond across the stars in its originary creative power. And yes, our scruffy protagonist finally gets a publishing deal and lots more in the bargain.

ΫψΫ

   When it comes to the conspiratorial worldview of history and current events, there are essentially three types of people:

(1) the true believer, who has read and researched much, is surprised by very little, and is sometimes accepting of more than sound reason and limited experience dictate;

(2) the absolute skeptic, who has no time for such inane, paranoid ramblings, believing them to be a diatribe of utter nonsense, and who has no patience to entertain anything of the sort; and

(3) the “well-rutted” worker-bee who is too distracted “making a living” and knows nothing of “hidden truth and forbidden knowledge,” but whose mind is open to pondering the imponderable taboos associated with any and all enigmas.

Particularly in the earlier chapters (and here and there throughout the book), our main protagonist tends to rage on in an occasionally sophomoric, diatribe style that is fairly typical of many who research and immerse themselves in the conspiratorial worldview. Some readers will require more patience than others to abide his rants. For example, a true believer might get bored or picayune about some of the arguments; the absolute skeptic will likely find it to be anathema and quit reading; and the busy person of established routine who knows nothing of these matters will probably find it somewhere between curious and dazzling.

The social critiques herein range from simple common sense to edgy complexity; the sentiments expressed are representative of the frustrating overwhelm and “tail-chasing” that go on in attempting to unravel the intricate web of deception that has been woven over and around us. The challenge is in using the “dissociated self” to analyze, articulate, and come to grips with the machinations of control systems. Those systems have been and continue to be the root cause of that dissociation, enabled via the mind-control of propaganda, with its constant barrage of disinformation. And so, this heuristic technique of immersion in the context is helpful to truly apprehend the conundrum of the researcher—to stand-in the-shoes of such folks who have only a partial or incomplete knowledge of an immense subject matter because they operate from a distinctly disadvantaged (viz., dissociated) condition.

---

[1]  Official Website of The Church of the SubGenius,™ Maintained by The SubGenius™ Foundation, Inc. in the name of J.R. “Bob” Dobbs–High Epopt & Living Slack Master. (n.d.). http://www.subgenius.com

[2] “Dissociation” might be thought of as a disabling condition of a psyche enthralled by its own deficient consciousness; or in consciousness theorist Jean Gebser’s terminology, possibilities for transparency (spiritual diaphaneity) remain in latency, so that a demonstrable presence of the future cannot fully unfold.
________________________________________________________________

ABSTRACT

          The old expression, “23 skidoo”—to get out with all due haste—is infused with new contextual life in this, Wyman Wicket’s debut novel. It’s Fantasy Sci-Fi and the sub-genre is Magical Realism: metapolitical non-fiction presented in the guise of a red pill, thought bomb thriller. In it, the protagonist, Nathan Sos (a scruffy, secret knowledge seeker) gets enmeshed in contending worlds, relying on some unique and very special helpers to succeed in his quest to transcend negative occult forces and their deep state servitors.

          Nathan has set out to write a book, The Cultural Mutant’s Guide to Consensual Reality and Culture Trance. In so doing he draws on his vast reservoir of prior research and writing. But a chance encounter with a dead man puts him squarely in the center of an ultra-secret project and on the radar of intelligence agencies. His rag-tag “team” of seasoned sleuths, extraterrestrials, and one celestial advisor arm him with the requisite knowledge, wisdom and confidence to negotiate his way clear of difficulties. In the process he is initiated into fantastical esoteric realms.

          This is the story of a lovable sub-genius, whose reverence for Jimi Hendrix, love, truth, and liberty, drives his quest to uncover secret knowledge; to debug “the big questions.” As such, 23 Skiddoo rips into the inner reaches of outer space. Two accommodating ET races orient readers to past and present; alien hybrid abominations show us, trenchantly, the resilience of the creative force, viz., survival—way back beyond across the stars. The jury is out on the planet’s Luciferians; it always has been. And their “System” drones on. But is there a polar opposite System set up to counter evil, greed, perversion, and injustice? Nathan thinks so. At least he is determined to find out—as determined as the System is to contain the new contagion known as “integral consciousness.”

          Through social critique, 23 Skiddoo riffs on the efforts of “the System” to keep mind-controlled citizen-serfs in a perpetual state of dissociation. In a semiotic jumble of deduction, inference, parable, metaphor, and lucid dreamscapes, one detects a new consciousness taking hold; adaptive yet steeped in tradition, it taps into that flow of universal “juice”—a spiritual life force enabling us to recall our true human potential, able to transform and release us from this prison planet. Moreover, Nathan Sos runs a factory that produces the Dystopiex, an ET-designed disruptor for neutralizing the System’s weaponized electromagnetic waves—that’s a definite start!

          This book asks a lot from its readers. There is much to chew on here, from side forays into ayahuasca-land and meanderings into sufic lore. But for those red pill mutants willing to undertake the journey, 23 Skiddoo yields up rich rewards. It’s an ambitious work that precipitates a strangely ponderous state in readers. Want more? Go here: https://wymanwicket.blogspot.com/

SUSSING OUT THE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA

NOTE: This editorial is solely the opinion of the author, and does not purport to reflect the views of those associated with the Chesapeake Film Festival. 
 

As those who know, know, there is a "homosexual agenda" that seeks to normalize homosexuality so that it is not only tolerated but made legitimate in mainstream Western law, culture and society.  To do this, mainstream media has been enlisted as a propaganda tool to convince the population that this type of sexuality should be embraced and accepted; that homosexuals should have rights and they should be permitted the same state recognition as heterosexuals in marriage, etc. It seems that the manufacturing of this public opinion and a strong homosexual lobby is actually turning the tide.  The U.S. Supreme Court appears to be on the verge of legally recognizing and countenancing homosexual marriage. And the "cultural Marxist thought police" have done a masterful job, as usual, of making it politically incorrect to challenge the homosexual agenda. 

The mainstream media also would have the people think that most of the population is supportive of the homosexual agenda. I believe this is highly over-blown. Still, many liberals (and even so-called conservatives) have taken up the torch and have bought into its acceptance. But this sort of mass brainwashing and socio-cultural conditioning is nothing new. It goes on all the time.  An unholy alliance of business and government, that many have dubbed the "cryptocracy," has perfected such campaigns since at least the early 20th Century, following the work of Edward Bernays (a nephew of Sigmund Freud; See, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays). The homosexual agenda is just one prong in a multi-pronged attack on Western society, and Americans, in particular. The purpose is to systematically dismantle and destroy the traditional values that have stood as a bulwark against those forces who would weaken the moral fabric of peoples everywhere in order to manipulate, overcome, control, and ultimately enslave them to a "nanny government" that is diametrically opposed to a strict constitutionalism meant to protect We the People from this very thing. These are the same forces who rally for gun control, the last protection against a tyrannical and out-of-control government. 

On the Eastern Shore of Maryland there still exist folks who reject the notion of nanny government and stand up for a rugged individualism as the sovereign source that first created the institution of government.  When government fails to serve and starts to dictate, through a socio-cultural proxy, what values we should accept, it is time to take a hard look and to challenge such a monolithic, hydra-headed monster.

No, merci!  -- as Gerard Depardieu cried out in Cyrano de Bergerac.  The homosexual agenda is part and parcel of the same force that would destroy us as a People. That force's other campaigns have done a fairly effective job of ruining education, industry, our money, our food, government, medicine, law -- just about everything. If you don't think so, I'd say you are quite out-of-touch with what is really going on.  

And so, I for one, do not wish to be a part of that very agenda that is so corrosive to us as a People.  Folks are welcome to have their own views, certainly.  But do not, for an instant, in my presence attempt to make light of the effect the homosexual agenda is having on society. I am certainly no prude. I don't pretend that homosexuality does not exist. I simply do not want it thrust in my face in a way that seeks to normalize it. Homosexual scenes, if they must be in films,  can be done in a way that allow the viewing audience to infer what is taking place, off-stage (so to speak).  If done less offensively I don't necessarily object.  Neither do I object if homosexuality is portrayed in a way that does not highlight the sexuality of homosexual behavior, as in the short (presented by the 2015 Chesapeake Film Festival), Misconception.  But when a film tries to portray homosexuality as OK, I cannot countenance that.  I am not "phobic" -- I am not bigoted against individuals who choose to be homosexual -- I simply object to their "alternative" lifestyle being flaunted and made to seem "normal."

As a board member of the CFF and as a programming committee member I feel obliged to live the values in which I believe. I think a good number of folks in and around Easton, MD still cherish those traditional values that have well-served the human family over many, many years. And so this is why I take this stance.  Other film festivals may be more accepting.  But if they are, as far as I'm concerned they are doing so out of ignorance of the bit part they are actually playing in a greater agenda that makes them unwitting surrogates of that agenda.