The weather report indicated
that today was the last cold day, at least for a small stretch of about one
week. Harland was never so weary of winter. After all it was almost mid-April. It
reminded him of his time in Glorieta living in a cabin a few miles up the
Sangre de Cristo mountains just outside of Santa Fe, New Mexico. Even well into
May the weather stayed cold and crummy there. Ah well, no need to fuss. Funny how we find
fault with the weather even though we treasure being alive on this lovely
(though troubled) planet.
It’s
the same being among people: they can seem as fickle as the weather and we can
never be quite sure where they’re coming from. Here's the point=>how do we
know that the opinions we hold of others have not been "engineered"
in slick ways so that we hold biases that may be completely wrong?—and if
so, might that "put us off the scent" of otherwise solid and
true allies in fighting the good fight?
Someone
may say or write something that is off-putting to you because it doesn’t
comport with your beliefs. Yet you find, overall, that there is great worth in
what the person otherwise says or writes and you feel that this outweighs what
you considered to be one mistaken notion. Let’s explore this phenomenon, thought Harland.
Groups
we are biased against may have been infiltrated and subverted from within. Of
course, "by their fruits you shall know them." Yet discerning the
"them," particularly from afar in our digital-display, modernist world is
fraught with difficulty.
Degeneration
tends to happen with every institution; a founder founds something and it
starts out as a beautiful thing but people screw it up for their own personal
agendas, egos, manias, or nefarious purposes. If you think about it, so-called
spiritual and/or secret societies that are founded for worthy, altruistic
purposes are particularly subject to being in the crosshairs for
subversion by cabals of evil-doers. The last thing they want is for
people to discover the truth about who we really are, e.g., our innate sovereignty,
the divine potential of the human being and the mysteries of consciousness.
They certainly don't want the gospel of Jesus to proliferate nor any real
esoteric path that leads to enlightenment (as opposed to the occult path to
Luciferianism).
But
how do we determine the real, the Good? We can use our discernment.
What's that? It's our accumulated knowledge and experience guided by intuition,
right? So what if our knowledge, experience and perhaps even our intuition is
or has been misguided, confounded? Then what?
Douglas
Gabriel and his wife Tyla run https://AIM4truth.org/
That's a news aggregator Harland tends to trust.
Also, their in-depth analyses of past and current geo-political players and happenings that support the current events they present is superb. Additionally, it is a place where they make their neo-anthroposophy
explicit to those “seekers of esoteric knowledge” who are interested. They are
both adepts of Rudolf Steiner’s work, known as “anthroposophy,” and they
recently put out an audio discussion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbNA3sOdh58&feature=youtu.be
It is entitled Secrets of the Invisible College. It features Douglas Gabriel in
discussion with another Steiner adept, John Barnwell. Harland finds Gabriel to
be quite the intellectual giant, albeit wordy and rather arid and annoyingly “left-brained.”
He is able to warm up a bit more to his Steiner compatriot historian
friend, Barnwell, who also comes across as a towering and informed intellect
though more lovingly “right-brained” and personable.
Harland
found this recent discussion between them to be quite fascinating and found
himself wanting some feedback from like-minded folks. Why?—because he’s not
sure he buys the Steiner anthroposophy, or at least their interpretation of it,
which they call "neo-anthroposophy." When Barnwell speaks,
Harland is inclined to like what he hears; when Gabriel starts bloviating he’s
put off a bit. Harland does like what Jesus says about "the meek
inheriting the Earth" and tends to agree with that wholeheartedly. He
noticed, curiously, that Gabriel upturns this “meekness notion” in their
discussion (but he qualified it, didn’t he?—might have to listen again).
One
of his pet peeves is that he is suspect of anyone who has ventured into the
Matrix and then proclaims essentially being “red pilled.” This is because of
who Harland is. He never bought into the hissing lie of the normative. Instead,
he dabbled a bit here and there in his bumbling way but never wanted to compromise
his liberty as a "joiner"; though some might say we expand our
liberty by the opportunities we encounter just by being a joiner and learning (with the right perception) what is to
be found there. Still, Harland mused,
those who are joiners, well, they're not
like me and so I can't identify very easily with them. This arouses a
natural suspicion in him. It could very
well be a weakness of mine. I don't know. Maybe it has caused me to become
an incurable romantic, a dilettante. I just don't know…
Now
in Gabriel's case, he claims to be clairvoyant and has advised people as an
astrologer. Once upon a time he worked in the Army for the NSA doing
intelligence work of some kind; then he became a Jesuit, assigned to infiltrate
and find out as much as possible about Rudolf Steiner's work; this resulted in
his mind being blown by what he discovered there and he "quit" the
Jesuits to become a Waldorf teacher for the next 20-30 years. He loves to bloviate
about how he consulted on the story line for Star Wars (a film Harland never liked, by the way). Gabriel has
mentioned that he is a Freemason and a Rosicrucian. Now all of that sounds as
tainted as can be to me. But then, to understand the world today such a
background—if it has truly been re-directed to the Good—could be a definite force
to be reckoned with.
Harland recalls too that Gabriel once mentioned his "friend," David Spangler. Now isn't he the guy who wrote:
Lucifer comes to give to us the final gift of wholeness. Ifwe accept it, then he is free and we are free. This is theLuciferic initiation. It is one that many people now, andin the days ahead, will be facing, for it is an initiationinto the New Age…No one will enter the New WorldOrder unless he or she will make a pledge to worshipLucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless they willtake a Luciferian initiation.—David Spangler, Reflections on the Christ(Forres,UK: Findhorn Press,1978), 44-45
These
days you almost need an intelligence background in order to cull and parse
the truth in current events; you definitely need to be a sleuth-hound, a real
investigative journalist. Gabriel seems to be the real deal even though his persona doesn't
resonate very well with old Harland. Tippecanoe and Tyla too, with her
Sophia Goddess stuff and aw shucks populist-sounding rhetoric. There may
be such a thing as a good "witch"—like Oz's Glinda, the Good Witch
of the North—and maybe Tyla is such a one, but Harland has no way of knowing. Whatever...
The
occult is a tricky thing. It can be used for good or for evil. Without
proper caution and guidance a person can easily become duped, which I think is
why the Church in the West has always steered away from occult practices, even
something as seemingly innocuous and therapeutic as meditation. Instead, prayer is the way of Christianity
and I've come to see that prayer really is a powerful thing.
So Harland
is struggling in a bit of a paradox box here. How do we clean the doors of
perception, purify ourselves in body, mind and soul, so as to plough
the clouds toward making the world a better place? That's a big question for him—THE
big question. We can hobo our way, approximating things with our discernment,
always seeking to improve upon it. That's the point he’s at right now. Harland
intends to gather up the many threads of his research (including the many strands of himself!) to explore
this whole identity/trust/discernment conundrum.
Just
as David Byrne takes on various personas, telling his interviewer, “maybe
later,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=dE-mxVxFXLg#
Harland too (with his own host of personas) finds himself in this limbo world that
Byrne explores by improvs in his video.
If he remembers correctly,
Gabriel might ascribe the identity conundrum to “not yet learning to control
the desires of the astral body.” As the warmth of Spring envelopes him, Harland will need to bring such thoughts out
into the natural world for airing and percolation. In this regard Harland
will follow the charmingly blasphemous “Jack” in The Ruling Class (1972, starring Peter O’Toole), i.e., he will need
to put these notions of his into his “galvanized pressure cooker.”
No comments:
Post a Comment