 |
| B.A.R. = British Accreditation Regency |
Black's Law Dictionary (4th Edition):
REGENCY. Rule; government; kingship. The man or body of men entrusted
with the vicarious government of a kingdom during the minority, absence,
insanity, or other disability of the king.
REGENT. A governor or ruler. One who vicariously administers the government of a kingdom, in the name of the king, during the latter's minority or other disability.
________________________________________________
By Ben Gates
August 3, 2006
Source: http://freedom-school.com/the-legal-craft.pdf
LAWYERS AND ATTORNEYS ARE NOT LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW!
AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT:
• The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State. (Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239 (1957))
• The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT! (Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))
The "CERTIFICATE" from the State Supreme Court:
• Only authorizes [attorneys] to practice law in courts as a member of the state judicial branch of government.[i]
• [Attorneys] Can only represent wards of the court, infants, and persons of unsound mind.(See CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM, VOLUME 7, SECTION 4.)
A "CERTIFICATE" is not a license to practice law as an occupation, nor to do business as a law firm!!
The state BAR card is not a license!!! It is a union dues card.
The BAR is a "professional association".
1. Like the actors union, painters union, etc.
2. No other association, even doctors, issue their own
license. All are issued by the STATE
3. The State BAR is a non-governmental private association - and dues must be current to sustain membership
The State BAR is an unconstitutional monopoly and an illegal and criminal enterprise that violates Article 2, Section 1, Separation of Powers clause of the Constitution. There is no power or authority for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or Executive branches within a state as the BAR is attempting. BAR members have invaded all branches of government and are attempting to control [the] de jure governments as agents of a foreign entity!
It is quite simple to see that a great fraud and conspiracy has been perpetrated on the people of America. The American BAR [British Accreditation Registry] is an offshoot from London Lawyers' Guild and was established by people with invasive monopolistic goals in mind. [1] In 1909 they incorporated this traitorous group in the state of Illinois and had the State Legislature (which was under the control of lawyers) pass an unconstitutional law that only members of this powerful union of lawyers, called the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, could practice law and hold all the key positions in law enforcement and the making of laws. At that time, Illinois became an outlaw state, and for all practical purposes, they seceded from the United States of America.
The BAR association then sent organizers to all the other states and explained to the lawyers there how much more profitable and secure it would be for them, as lawyers, to join this union and be protected by its bylaws and cannons. They issued to the lawyers in each state a charter from the Illinois organization. California joined in 1927 and a few reluctant states and their lawyers waited until the 1930's to join when the treasonous act became de facto and the citizens became captives. [2] Under this system, the lawyers could guarantee prejudged decisions for the privileged class against the lower class.
This was all made possible by the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION to favor codes and unlawfully substitute them in place of Constitutional laws. The Constitution was written in plain English and the statutes passed by Congress were also in plain English, with the intent of Congress how each law should be used and not the opinions of various judges as the codes list. Any normal person can read the Constitution and statutes and understand them without any trouble.
The public in California was shocked to learn that the state government has no control or jurisdiction over the BAR Association or its members. The state does not accredit the law schools or hold BAR examinations. They do not issue state licenses to lawyers. The BAR Association accredits all the law schools, holds their private examinations and selects the students they will accept in their organization and issues them so-called licenses but keeps the fees for themselves. The BAR is the only one that can punish or disbar a lawyer. They also select the lawyers that they consider qualified for Judgeships and various other offices in the STATE. Only the BAR Association, or their designated committees, can remove any of these lawyers from public office. The State Legislature will not change this system as they are also a designated committee of the BAR.
On August 21, 1984, Rose Bird, Chief Justice of the California State Supreme Court, another of the BAR Associations judicial committees, stated in essence, that the BAR should determine the legality of all initiatives before they were allowed to go on the ballot.
This is contrary to both state and federal Constitutions, as well as the laws of this Nation instituted By and For the People as a sovereign unity of independent states of We The People, not a fraudulent corporate entity of lawyers. This is a tremendous amount of power for a private union that is incorporated and headquartered in Illinois to hold over the citizens of California or any other state. [3] The only recourse is through this initiative process and vote by the people.
After the Founding Fathers had formed the Constitution, outlining the laws as to the way our government was to be run, Thomas Jefferson said, in essence, "This proves that plain people, if given the chance, can enact laws and run a government as well as or better than royalty and the blue bloods of Europe." The American people must stop thinking that lawyers are better than they are and can do a better job than they can before the courts of America. Under the Common Law and the Laws of America, nowhere is it expressly given for anyone to have the power or the right to form a Corporation. Corporations are given birth because of ignorance on the part of the American people and are operating under implied consent and power which they have usurped and otherwise stolen from the people. By right and by law they have no power, authority or jurisdiction, and must be put out of business by the good citizens of America in their fight for freedom.
The U.S. Constitution guarantees to every state in this union a republican form of government. Any other form of government is forbidden! No public officer or branch of government can be limited to a ruling class of any kind, or the states become aristocracies and not Republics. Also, the lawyers have made themselves 1st class citizens, where many public offices and branches of government are open to lawyers only. All other people are limited to only two branches of government and to only certain offices in those two branches of government, making all people who are non-lawyers into 2nd class subject citizens.
When the courts belong to the people, as the United States Constitution requires, (Article IV, Section 4), We the People, will never rule against themselves. In these unconstitutional foreign tribunals "courts" [4] (hoodlum centers), men in black dresses, that are unconstitutional robes of nobility. (Article 1, Section 9 and 10) dispense a perverted ideology, where the people are terrorized by members of the Black Robe Cult (lawyers and lawyer judges in the courtrooms).
The legislative branch of government does not have the Constitutional power to issue Court Orders or any other kind of orders to the people, as a "fiction court" or a "court/corporation for profit and gain" cannot reach parity with a lawful man. Only Presidents and Governors have the Constitutional power to grant pardons, but lawyers and lawyer-judges are unconstitutionally granting pardons with "immunity from prosecution." Citizens are not permitted to act like people in the courts. The Citizen (2nd class) is told that he does not know how to fill out fancy lawyer forms; that he is not trained in the law; that he does not know court rules and procedures; etc. This is an unconstitutional "lawyer system"; only hearsay substitutes (lawyers), not under oath, have access to the fiction/for profit and gain courts, even though only sworn testimony and evidence can be presented in court. Anything else is "Bill of Attainder," not permitted under the U.S. Constitution (Article 1, Sections 9 and 10).
The U.S. Constitution does not give anyone the right to a lawyer or the right to counsel, or the right to any other hearsay substitute. The 6th Amendment is very specific, that the accused only has the right to the assistance of counsel and this assistance of counsel can be anyone the accused chooses without limitation.
Lawyers and lawyer-judges: Created unconstitutional "lawyer system" pre-trial "motions" and "hearings" to have eternal extortionistic litigations, which is BARRATRY and also is in violation of the U.S. Constitution, and Article 1, as this places defendants in double jeopardy a hundred times over. Defendants only have a right to trial, not trials.
When a criminal is freed on a technicality, he is freed because of a fix and a pay-off, as a defendant can only be freed if found innocent by a jury not by any technicality. Whenever a lawyer is involved in a case directly or indirectly, as a litigant or assisting in counsel, all lawyer-judges have to disqualify themselves, as there cannot be a Constitutional trial, and also there would be a violation of the conflicts of interest laws, along with the violation of separation of powers and checks and balances, because 'officers of the court' are on both sides of the bench. These same lawyer-judges are awarding or approving lawyer fees, directly and indirectly, amounting to billions of dollars, all in violation of conflict of interest laws. As long as there are lawyers, there will never be any law, Constitution or justice. There will only be mob rule, rule by a mob of lawyers.
Case law is unconstitutional as case law is enacted by the judicial branch of government. [2]
When a lawyer-judge instructs, directs, or gives orders to a jury, the lawyer-judge is tampering with the jury. He also tampers with testimony when he orders the answers to be either "Yes" or "No." The lawyer-judge also tampers, fixes, and rigs the trial when he orders anything stricken from the record, or when he "rules" certain evidence and the truth to be inadmissible. This makes the trial and transcript fixed and rigged, because the jury does not hear the real truth and all the facts. Juries are made into puppets by the lawyers and lawyer-judges. All lawyers are automatically in the judicial branch of government, as they have the unconstitutional title of nobility (Article 1, Section 9 and 10), as officers of the court.
Citizens have to be elected or hired to be in any branch of government, but non-lawyer citizens are limited to only two of the three branches of government. Lawyers, as 1st class citizens, can be hired or elected to any of the three branches of government. Lawyers, as officers of the court, in the Judicial Branch, are unconstitutionally in two branches of government at the same time whenever they are hired or elected to the executive or legislative branches. This is a violation of the separation of powers, checks and balances, and the conflict of interest laws.
District attorneys and STATE attorneys have taken over the Grand Juries from the people, where the people are denied access to the Grand Juries when they attempt to present evidence of crimes committed in the courtrooms by the lawyers and lawyer-judges. The U.S. Constitution, being the supreme fundamental law, is not and cannot be ambiguous as [2 This fact was validated by Judge John F. Molloy in his book, The Fraternity. (2004)] to be interpreted, or it would be a worthless piece of paper and we would have millions of interpretations (unconstitutional amendments) instead of the few we have now. That is why all judges and public servants are sworn to support the U.S. Constitution, not interpret it.
Under international orders: all lawyers, whether they left law school yesterday or 50 years ago, are exactly the same. All lawyers have to file the same motions and follow the same procedures in using the same unconstitutional "lawyer system". [5] In probate, the lawyers place themselves in everyone's will and estate. When there are minor children as heirs, the lawyer-judges appoint a lawyer (a child molesting Fagin) for each child and, at times, the lawyer fees exceed the total amount of the estate. An outrageous amount of tax money is directly and indirectly stolen by lawyers. Money that is budgeted to County/City/Borough Boards, School Boards and other local and federal agencies eventually finds its way into the pockets of lawyers, as ALL of these agencies are tricked and forced into eternal extortionistic litigation.
References added:
[1] From Fruit from a Poisonous Tree by attorney Melvin
Stamper, JD
"The scheme also provided for the control of the courts
via the 1913 creation of the American Bar Association, whose parent
organization was the European International Bar Association, which was the creation
of Rothschild. This allowed the International Bankers to control the practice
of law, in that the only ones permitted to practice before the courts were
those who were educated under their brand of law, which was only Admiralty and
Contract law. Common law of the people was to be replaced as it gave the
natural man many jurisdictional protections from the bankers’
legislation." (See Fruit from a Poisonous Tree, page 58.)
[2] From Fruit from a Poisonous Tree by attorney Melvin
Stamper, JD
"Contract law is above the Constitution and under the jurisdiction of Equity/Admiralty courts, so the governments began to contract with everyone. The 1930s saw federal legislation providing for the registration of babies through applications for birth certificates. Government workers could get maternity leave with pay. The States pushed for registration of cars through applications for certificates of title and for registration of land through registration of deeds of trust. Constructive trusts were created secretly by adhesion contracts, giving benefits either present or future and as a result, each of the people blindly walked into the trap of United States democracy and its jurisdiction by the signing of contracts, thereby agreeing to be sureties for the debts of the United States and collateral for the Federal Reserve Bank, Inc."(See Fruit from a Poisonous Tree, page 74.)
[3] From Fruit from a Poisonous Tree by attorney Melvin
Stamper, JD
"In the 1950s, the Uniform Commercial Code was adopted in most of the States as a means ofunifying the generally accepted procedures for handling the new legal system of dealing with commercial fictions as though they were real. Security instruments replaced substance as collateral for debts. Security instruments could be supported by presumptive adhesion contracts. Debt instruments with collateral and accommodating parties could be used instead of money. Money and the need for money was disappearing, and a uniform system of law had to be put in place to allow the courts to uphold the security instruments that depended on commercial fictions as a basis for compelling payment or performance. All this was accomplished by the mid-1960s." (See Fruit from a Poisonous Tree, page 62.)
[4] From Judge Dale, a retired Federal Judge:
"Why is the BAR Guild so hell-bent on keeping everything on the private side? Because the public side invokes Constitutional issues and nothing they do can withstand a Constitutional challenge. The organic Constitution still exists in its original glory and authority and is buried in the US Printing Office. All amendments since 1871 do not exist. Why? It was the "corporate mission statement" for the District of Columbia that was written in 1871 to resemble the organic Constitution. Is it that corporate mission statement that has been amended since 1871 and chopped up as of late." (See Lawfully Yours, page 17. Available as a free download at https://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/lawfully-yours-ninth-edition.pdf)
[5] From Who is Running America
"The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), has been adopted in whole or substantially by all states. (See: Blacks Law, 6th Ed. pg 1531) In essence, all court decisions are based on commercial law or business law and has criminal penalties associated with it. Rather than openly calling this new law Admiralty/Maritime Jurisdiction, it is called Statutory Jurisdiction." (See Who is Running America, Available at https://anticorruptionsociety.wordpress.com/2010/12/08/who-is-running-america/)
Note: For purposes of emphasis and clarification, the above image was added, the definition of the term BAR was also added, as well as one correction, footnotes and supporting references. The author's work was left intact.
[i] [Correction: membership is to a private corporation listed on Dun and Bradstreet, for example - JUDICIARY/SUPREME COURTS OF THE STATE OF OHIO.]
************************************
Next up: Consider the following restatement of the problem and a simple remedy ("Caltrop") from the Living Law Society:
Through no fault of their own, the vast majority of Americans are unaware of the substantial differences between the organic Constitution for the United States of America and the de facto corporate “UNITED STATES®” constitution created by usurped Congress for the District of Columbia in A. D. 1871 [see: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 3002(15)(A), Cal. Commercial Code, Sec. 9307(h) and the Act of 1871] that laid the foundation for successive De Facto US Corporations that have masqueraded ‘as if’ they were the original, organic founding fathers, Republican form of state compact Federation Government created by the original Independent Nation states.
Most Americans are unaware they are dealing daily with a “reality” similar to that in the movie: “The Matrix”, constructed by constitutionally-banned BAR attorneys / foreign agents, i.e. de jure versus de facto; organic Government versus corporate municipal (fake) “government”.
The organic Constitution only has thirteen lawfully-ratified organic Articles of Amendment. Every Article of Amendment, up to and including the original Thirteenth Amendment (March 12, A. D. 1819), was lawfully ratified by the organic republic states of the American Union, not by private, for-profit, foreign (Vatican / Crown), Municipal / Territorial corporations pretending to be de jure state governments. [See, Anna Von Reitz regarding this historical fraud.]
Every so-called “law” or legislative “act” since ratification of the organic Thirteenth Amendment that was or is tainted by foreign actors operating in violation of TONA (i.e. CROWN BAR attorneys, dual-citizenship nationals etc.) is void, ab initio, as if it did not happen. [NOTE: "TONA" stands for Titles of Nobility Amendment (TONA, Article of Amendment XIII to the Organic Constitution of September 17th 1787 (amended March 12, A. D. 1819)]
“An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” Norton v. Shelby Co., State of Tennessee, 118 U.S. 425 (1886)
All levels of government in America since A.D. 1871 has stealthily been supplanted by Constitutionally Banned foreign agents (BAR attorneys, dual Nationals, foreign agents of the CFR, UN, WEF, Bilderbergers etc) with territorial municipal corporate (fake) governments (government de facto), which lawfully only has jurisdiction over government-created ens legis “legal persons” (i.e. corporations, trusts and other corporate entities), its officers and employees!
|
|
An Overview of the Points of a Legal Caltrop
- A live
American man or woman living upon the soil of any of the de jure fifty
republic states is a constituent Member of the American Body Sovereign
[Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 Dallas (U. S.) 419 @ 469, 1 L. Ed. 440 (A. D.
1793)].
- Any
live American man or woman living upon the soil of California (est. A. D.
1849) (over twenty-one years old) has natural and unalienable Rights* protected
by both the Ninth Amendment to the de jure federal Constitution (as
lawfully amended in A. D. 1819) and Article One, Section Twenty-one of the
Declaration of Rights of the de jure California Constitution (A. D. 1849)
from any legislative or statutory infringement.
- The
lex fori of the fifty Titles of the “UNITED STATES CODE” (sic), as defined
by Congress, is “in the district” or “within the district” [American
Banana Co. v. U.S. Fruit, 213 U.S. 347 at 357-358 (1909); United
States v. Spelar, 338 U.S. 217 at 222 (1949)].
- No
land of any of the fifty de jure republic states of the
American Union is located within a Federal district, only Federal
territories and enclaves are located within a Federal district [Pollard
v. Hagan, 44 U.S. 213, 221, 223 (1845)].
- The
lex fori of the twenty-nine Codes of the “STATE OF CALIFORNIA”, as defined
by the State Legislature, is “in this state” or “in the state” [Cal.
Revenue and Taxation Sections 130(f), 6017, et al.].
- Absent
a bona fide Contract, untainted by actual or constructive Fraud [Cal.
Civil Code, Sections 1572-1573], neither the officers nor employees of
either the corporate “UNITED STATES®” (sic) or the corporate “STATE OF
CALIFORNIA” (sic) have any authority to enforce the aforesaid
corporations’ municipal codes outside of the law of the forum defined by
their respective legislative authority [Clearfield Trust Company v. United
States, 318 U.S. 363 (1943)].
- Lack
of full disclosure or concealment of material Facts by the officers or
employees of either the corporate “UNITED STATES®” (sic) or the corporate
“STATE OF CALIFORNIA” (sic) constitutes Fraud and voids any alleged
contract from the beginning (ab initio) [37 Am. Jur. 2d, Section 8].
Every Remedy offered by a Legal Caltrop is authorized by Law.
Anyone can extinguish a contract by rescission for the reason
that their consent was obtained by the other party through fraud and deceit
[Cal. Civil Code, Sections 1688 and 1689(b)(1)].
The Federal and State “government” systems are steeped in
fraud and deceit, which is ultra-sophisticated, and designed to defraud every
natural-born American, in every republic state of the American Union, of all
unalienable Rights to which he or she is entitled by birthright. This is
done in such a way by B.A.R. attorneys, as to prevent detection of how it
happened by most people. It is the B.A.R. attorneys keep the American
People on a treadmill as an abject wage-slaves / servants of the
creditor-masters of the private, foreign, for-profit, corporate “government” of
the “UNITED STATES®”—i.e., the foreign principals of the private Federal
Reserve and the International Monetary Fund (IMF)—for the rest of their lives.
___________________
* Unalienable Rights for man (and woman) are a gift from the Creator of the Universe (Almighty God) and are superior to statutory civil rights (i.e. statutory benefits) are granted to legal “persons” created by Congress and State Legislatures.
No comments:
Post a Comment