The Notorious "Dog Case," Part 2

NOTE: For Part 1, See blog post dated 2/1.

County prosecutors might seek to impute jurisdiction-based-on-an-implicit-contract. That is, can the Montgomery County prosecutor argue that I (implicitly) “contractually consented” simply by residing in Montgomery County, paying property taxes, accessing and using benefits/county services? — e.g., trash/recyclable pick-up, fire and rescue coverage and subsidized bus services (in case I need those) and county maintenance of general common property, access to Mont. Co. parks, etc.  After all, they might argue, you don’t live on an island and you also pay various other taxes that go into the county’s coffers. Doesn’t that mean you have a contract?

 

Or how about my (even obliquely) referencing the corporate state of Maryland’s "laws" upon which the corporate county of Montgomery’s regulations and ordinances are based?—is that not somehow fatal to my argument of the supremacy of individual sovereignty?

 

To both of these queries I would offer the following retort: pragmatism in the service of family self-preservation is neither a waiver of individual sovereignty nor a capitulation to the supposed sovereignty of a corporate government entity.

 

Analysis 

If the supposed govt. sovereign is no govt. sovereign at all, and the charade is exposed, then there can be no tacit agreement—before, now, or in the future—and hence no implicit or implied contract exists by simply accepting these sham entities as lawful government (or rejecting their supposed "inclusive contractual services"). They simply have no standing, even though they've "captured" the courts and can unlawfully reek havoc on people's lives. 

 

Any decision to "go along to get along" (as in paying certain taxes to avoid a bigger hassle) is a pragmatic one wherein we choose our battles carefully based upon the choices presented. However, by so doing we are not necessarily ceding our rights, but essentially "paying under protest" and holding the assertion of our rights in abeyance, i.e., reserving our rights in order to fight on another day of our choosing. 

Could the prosecutor destroy that argument by claiming laches? — viz., by lack of diligence and activity in making a legal claim, or moving forward with legal enforcement of a right, am I not thereby divested from now asserting that right? Good luck. For starters, the natural law of protecting one’s family by any and all means would need to be overcome. But in any event, which defense is more applicable to the instant “case”?—the prosecutor’s unclean hands? or a laches argument against me for failing to challenge my inferior bargaining position from an existing status of coercion and duress?

 

Consider this info from the link found in my article, The Notorious “Dog Case”:

https://anticorruptionsociety.wordpress.com/is-our-government-just-another-corporation/ : 

The American people did not and would not have agreed to any of this. They were kept in the dark and today find themselves unwittingly ‘contracting’ with a completely corrupt corporate franchise system, that doesn’t represent their best interests and that they don’t even know is in place. Therefore, the CIA has achieved their goal:  ". . . everything the American people believe is false.”

So, let’s stop calling these bodies and agencies our government. They are not. They are only posing as government. They do not serve us, but are actually private corporations listed on Dunn and Bradstreet by their all caps corporate names. We owe them no loyalty and it is our duty to expose the fact that they are fraudulently receiving public funds and ‘governmental immunity’ while they are actively profiting from and harming us all . . . even if many of their employees are as much in the dark as the rest of the population.

The payment of property taxes by my mortgagor is required under my mortgage agreement. I object to this STATE hold-up game, as well as to usury (any interest paid at all) to the mortgagor. It took me many years to understand the nature of both of these “takings.” After recently discovering the true nature of both, I wanted to sell my house in Montgomery County, MD, thus unburdening myself from the property tax taking of my wealth and ending my immoral involvement in usury. In fact, I wanted to move far away from this kind of socialist-type control. And I would have moved away long ago if it was only my decision. But my wife is on title and she refuses to budge; my live-in daughter and granddaughter, too, have no other options while also being firmly ensconced in work and school.

 

And so decisions to “go along to get along” become pragmatic ones. Other taxes that help to enrich the state and county, e.g., income tax and sales tax, are similar and can also be handled pragmatically.

 

Yet I’ve chosen to “die on this ‘dog case’ hill", if need be.  Defenses to all of this claptrap is just as I have stated in The Notorious “Dog Case”:  fraudulent concealment, fictitious plaintiffs, unclean hands — Or unfair bargaining advantage, duress, and coercion founded upon the STATE being in the position of imposing slavery and debt bondage. (Similarly, I have rejected the wearing of a muzzle, disguised as govt.-directed "face mask health mandates," adding to the above defenses infringements on our personal, property, and constitutional rights. But I digress...)

And consider another contractual element that is lacking: mutuality.[Thanks go out to the Anti-Corruption Society for the following.]

A corporation is a fictional character or entity in law, created by the government, which makes that fictional character or entity the intellectual property of the government but you are never told that! Corporations can own any number of other corporations but can never own a flesh and blood human being!

As corporations only exist on paper, they are both defined and bound by the law of contracts — more words on paper. In other words, corporations cannot nod their heads, shake hands or utter any words of affirmation.

All laws created under this parent corporation will essentially become corporate laws and regulations to govern the parent corporation and all subordinate or sub-corporations owned by the parent. The following is a list of government corporations. The list includes the Mother corporation (the UNITED STATES) and many sub-corporations — all the way down to the local school board: 

Name the public recognizes	Dun and Bradstreet Corporate Listing
United States of America	UNITED STATES
Dept of Health and Human Services	HEALTH & HUMANS SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
Center for Disease Control	CDC
Maryland	STATE OF MARYLAND
Maryland Governor	EXECUTIVE OFFICE STATE OF MARYLAND
Maryland state legislators	LEGISLATIVE OFFICE OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Maryland judges	JUDICIARY/COURTS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Maryland Dept of Health	HEALTH, MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF
Montgomery County Health Dept	MONTGOMERY CO MD HEALTH
"My Town", Maryland	"MY TOWN", CITY OF
"My Town" Board of Education	"MY TOWN" BOARD OF EDUCATION also traded as "MY TOWN" SCHOOL DISTRICT and "MY TOWN" SCHOOLS

These corporate laws and regulations are called “statutes” and their affect and control over human beings is deceptively obtained by consent through civil contracts.[1 ] Look up the word ‘person' in any modern law dictionary and you will see that a corporation is regarded as a person and not a flesh and blood human being.

These civil contracts were secured by and through several federal and state voluntary registration programs designed to convert and enslave flesh and blood American citizens of the Republic into corporate property. These registration programs always involved government benefits as an inducement. However, nothing is free and when the state and federal governments offer anything for free, you can bet that upon your acceptance there are ropes and chains about to be attached to your neck, hands and ankles!

Legally, these civil contracts lacked “mutuality,” meaning that all registrants must understand the true nature and intent of the contract and subsequently must knowingly accept or consent to the terms of those contracts. The government’s subversive tactics perverts “mutuality” and lawfully eliminates any and all contractual relationships, as historically established by the International Law of Contracts a/k/a Uniform Commercial Code. [Emphasis added.]

_____

[ 1 ] The government by becoming a corporator, (See 28 USC §3002(15(A)(B)(C), 22 USCA 286(e)) lays down its sovereignty and takes on that of a private citizen. It can exercise no power which is not derived from the corporate charter. (See: The Bank of the United States v. Planters Bank of Georgia, 5 L.Ed. (Wheat) 244 (1824); FHA v. Burr, 309 U.S. 242 (1940)).

____________________ 

For now, on the state/county level, I've only chosen to be a "cognitive dissident" with regard to this dog case and face masks. (On the federal/state level I'm already a Truther on income taxes. Go here to see why: https://jsuss.blogspot.com/2020/07/jds.html )

 

So I say: "Go ahead. Make my day." The fact that the corporate county entity has a (private) police force and SWAT teams and jails and prosecutors only means that they can wrongfully intimidate you, interrupt your freedom, the flow of your life, and possibly cause you bodily harm.

 

Do they really want to "make an example out of me" on this petty issue in an effort to collect a piddling fine (or try to squeeze income taxes from my paltry income)?  If they do so, won’t they get slammed with the type of publicity they deserve-but-fear? — Most probably they would, and I’d be happy to call their bluff.

 

Fortunately for me and for others being squeezed for such inanities, all of this unlawful taking will be going away very soon. Once Fearless Leader, President Donald J. Trump, begins his second term—once he is back in the saddle again in a month or so—then we'll see what happens to the corporate government, USA, Inc., including all copy-cat state and county corporate governments. These sham entities and their unlawful money grubbing from patriots-of-faith, who are standing up for a return to our original (non-corporatized) constitutional republic, will simply be revealed for the imposters that they really are.

A maxim of the common law: It is fraud to conceal a fraud; and fraud vitiates everything.

 

As Alfred E. Neumann used to say: “What, me worry?”—not me, not on your life!